Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Chronograph question......

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-19-2005 | 07:31 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 0
From: Baileysville, WV
Default Chronograph question......

I was wondering how many of you guys have chrono'd factory ammo and checked how badly it was overrated on advertised velocity? I know from readin a lot of books that most say it is overrated...I'm sure of this is due to factory using longest barrel they could find but I wonder if any calibers really stand out a sbeing overrated in factory trim according as opposed to real world numbers. Thanks in advance...
Doe Dumper is offline  
Reply
Old 01-19-2005 | 10:37 PM
  #2  
driftrider's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: Coralville, IA. USA
Default RE: Chronograph question......

The only factory loads I've ever chronographed was the Winchester 45 grain JHP .22-250 load, which is advertised to reach 4000fps. Out of my Ruger M77VT with it's 26" barrel, this load clocked and average of 4016fps, with an SD, if I recall correctly, was right at 10fps. So yes, this load, in my gun, lived up the the advertised velocity, but I will tell you that it is a very hot load, and I've had several rounds show mild pressure signs.

Mike
driftrider is offline  
Reply
Old 01-20-2005 | 01:06 PM
  #3  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Chronograph question......

I have chrono'd Remington factory stuff in 300RUM and it was right on target believe it or not. But hornady light mag stuff is BS.

I can see the ammo manfactures point however. For example, my 300RUM in remington 700 factory barrel shot 180gr nosler partitions 3180fps and in my krieger barrel it shoots em almost 3280fps.
 
Reply
Old 01-20-2005 | 02:35 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default RE: Chronograph question......

I haven't chrono'd much rifle ammo but I've done a decent amount of handgun ammo and almost without exception, factory numbers are inflated. Sometimes considerably.
HUNTER74 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-20-2005 | 06:45 PM
  #5  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: Chronograph question......

They do not seem to be as far off as they used to be. I think now that more people have chronographs, that they don't inflate it as much. I have chronographed quite a bit of Federal ammo and found them pretty close. What suprises me is how low some of the velocities are on ammo that does not claim any velocity on paper. I have tested 250-3000 ammo from WW. Their 100 grain silvertips average 2600 fps. That was picking a few from several different boxes. My first chronograph used the old paper screens. Good machine but those screens were a little spendy plus I always had to remember to order new ones.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 01-20-2005 | 06:50 PM
  #6  
White-tail-deer's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
From: Southeast PA
Default RE: Chronograph question......

I've chrono'd Winchester Supreme extended velocity, .270 WIN, 130 gr. Power Point. It is published at 3060 fps, I got nearly 3100 out of my 22" Ruger MKII.
White-tail-deer is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rammer
Reloading
13
03-27-2008 02:44 PM
Rickmur
Technical
9
04-12-2006 09:06 PM
700bdl870exp
Firearm Review Forum
14
03-16-2006 08:05 PM
cbanman
Technical
2
09-30-2003 06:23 PM
SDBowHunter
Bowhunting
6
03-09-2003 10:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.