Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
#11
Typical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 579
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Todd1700,
I agree with your statement. Tell your friend to sale his 300 and buy a 25-06. I've had more deer over the years drop in their tracks with the 25-06 shooting a 115 gr. Ballistic Tip. For some reason most of the deer I've taken with the 06 fall on the spot. I also have taken many with a 280 Rem, 257 Roberts, 270 Win, 300 Win Mag, 243 Win, & 7MM Rem Mag. I can only think of one dropping with the 270 & probably 3-4 with the 280. The results are usually 20-40 yards before dying. Tell your friend he will be able to see the deer fall through the scope on the 25-06 and not get tagged in the face like with the 300 WSM. Retire the 300 until he is elk hunting.
I agree with your statement. Tell your friend to sale his 300 and buy a 25-06. I've had more deer over the years drop in their tracks with the 25-06 shooting a 115 gr. Ballistic Tip. For some reason most of the deer I've taken with the 06 fall on the spot. I also have taken many with a 280 Rem, 257 Roberts, 270 Win, 300 Win Mag, 243 Win, & 7MM Rem Mag. I can only think of one dropping with the 270 & probably 3-4 with the 280. The results are usually 20-40 yards before dying. Tell your friend he will be able to see the deer fall through the scope on the 25-06 and not get tagged in the face like with the 300 WSM. Retire the 300 until he is elk hunting.
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Tell your friend to sale his 300 and buy a 25-06.
#13
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Tell your friend to sale his 300 and buy a 25-06. I've had more deer over the years drop in their tracks with the 25-06 shooting a 115 gr. Ballistic Tip. For some reason most of the deer I've taken with the 06 fall on the spot. I also have taken many with a 280 Rem, 257 Roberts, 270 Win, 300 Win Mag, 243 Win, & 7MM Rem Mag. I can only think of one dropping with the 270 & probably 3-4 with the 280. The results are usually 20-40 yards before dying. Tell your friend he will be able to see the deer fall through the scope on the 25-06 and not get tagged in the face like with the 300 WSM. Retire the 300 until he is elk hunting.
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,284
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
I don't know what it is about the 25.06 but it has proven to be pure deer poison for me. I like my 30.06 and have killed lots of deer with it, some run some didn't. I got the new gun bug several years ago and bought a 25.06. I have since taken quite a few deer with that gun and have only had one that ran and he only went maybe 20yds. I've had several to fall out of the scope so fast when i pulled the trigger i actually thought i missed. Needless to say i have fallen in love with the 25.06. It's a pleasure to shoot, very accurate, mild recoil and no doubt hits the target like lighting. Having said all that i would like to have a 260 Rem as my next rifle if one ever comes around that i like. I like the Kimber 84m but have heard they are really light. I've also looked at a Ruger but don't know much about them. I'm hoping maybe one day Remington will chamber the 260 in a rifle that i like. The CDL or Classic would be nice or maybe i'll get lucky and run across one of the BDL's they use to offer in that caliber but i highly doubt it.
#15
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Nobody beats Remington when it comes to dumping on their own developments. If they offered their synthetic ADL with a 24 inch barrel in 260 it would sell like hot cakes.
#16
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Why is it that everyone has to have a synthetic stocked rifle? To me they are just pure ugly. The only guns I own with synthetic are my Benelli shotguns. I've shot wood/blue guns all my life and I've never had a problem with any of them. My mountain rifle is wood/blue and I think it is beautiful, and I'm not afraid of scratching it up. I bought it to use and I intend to use it. My first choice was the laminated/stainless version but I had about $550 in Bass Pro gift certificates and that was not a stocked rifle for them so I had to go with the wood/blued version.
I have shot several deer with my .260 and even though they don't drop in their tracks, that fact is they are all dead. I don't understand the fascination with having a deer drop in it's tracks. And I don't get the magnum craze, I've got a .300 Win Mag and it is not needed on whitetails, that's why I bought the .260. It's all about shooting the right bullet and putting it in the right place. Maybe the people on the magum bandwagon are trying to compensate for something.
I have shot several deer with my .260 and even though they don't drop in their tracks, that fact is they are all dead. I don't understand the fascination with having a deer drop in it's tracks. And I don't get the magnum craze, I've got a .300 Win Mag and it is not needed on whitetails, that's why I bought the .260. It's all about shooting the right bullet and putting it in the right place. Maybe the people on the magum bandwagon are trying to compensate for something.
#17
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Why is it that everyone has to have a synthetic stocked rifle? To me they are just pure ugly.
#18
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
The 260 is a great deer round! It is sad that it hasnt grown in popularity! Maybe if they woulda called it the "260 ultra short action notamagnum" it would have been "cool" having a long name.
#19
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 323
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
I recently bought a CZ 550 in 6.5x55, and I am delighted with it. It is the most accurate out-of-box rifle I have ever owned, better even than my two Remington 700s, also purchased this year.
Not quite sure I would agree that the CZ is a better quality rifle than the Remington, because I am pretty happy with my Remingtons, but I would not hesitate a single minute to buy another CZ, and recommend them highly. If it isn't better it is at least the equal, that's for sure.
I have no experience with the .260, but I wish I had a .260 instead of my .243. The long, skinny 140 grain 6.5mm bullet works so well in the Swede that I am sure it would be great in the .260 also.
Not quite sure I would agree that the CZ is a better quality rifle than the Remington, because I am pretty happy with my Remingtons, but I would not hesitate a single minute to buy another CZ, and recommend them highly. If it isn't better it is at least the equal, that's for sure.
I have no experience with the .260, but I wish I had a .260 instead of my .243. The long, skinny 140 grain 6.5mm bullet works so well in the Swede that I am sure it would be great in the .260 also.
ORIGINAL: Briman
Another good reason to buy a CZ rather than a Remington. Isn't it pretty sad that a company 1/2 way around the world in a former communist country can make the quality and selections that we want but the buffoons that run the domestic companies cannot?
Get a CZ 550 in 6.5x55- it can be handloaded to better performace than the .260, and its a better quality rifle to boot.
Another good reason to buy a CZ rather than a Remington. Isn't it pretty sad that a company 1/2 way around the world in a former communist country can make the quality and selections that we want but the buffoons that run the domestic companies cannot?
Get a CZ 550 in 6.5x55- it can be handloaded to better performace than the .260, and its a better quality rifle to boot.
#20
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: Why did the .260 Remington not take off as a standard caliber?
Nobody beats Remington when it comes to dumping on their own developments. If they offered their synthetic ADL with a 24 inch barrel in 260 it would sell like hot cakes.