Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-02-2004 | 04:26 AM
  #11  
JagMagMan's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,514
Likes: 0
From: Port Neches, Texas
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

Why is everyone having trouble spelling Trashco?
JagMagMan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2004 | 06:21 AM
  #12  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

Have a Tasco World Class 4x on my .250 Savage Ruger Ultralite. One day at the range , about 20 years ago, I just finished sighting in and was retrieving my targets when a gust of wind blew the gun from the rest off the bench and on to the ground. Rechecked the zero and to my surprise it was and is still dead on to this day. The Leupold on the Rem.700 on the bench next to me didn,t fare as well.It ended up in at least three pieces. The next time I saw that guy at the range the 700 had a World Class 3x9x40 in the mounts.
RonK is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2004 | 08:44 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Brook, IN
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

ORIGINAL: RonK

Have a Tasco World Class 4x on my .250 Savage Ruger Ultralite. One day at the range , about 20 years ago, I just finished sighting in and was retrieving my targets when a gust of wind blew the gun from the rest off the bench and on to the ground. Rechecked the zero and to my surprise it was and is still dead on to this day. The Leupold on the Rem.700 on the bench next to me didn,t fare as well.It ended up in at least three pieces. The next time I saw that guy at the range the 700 had a World Class 3x9x40 in the mounts.

Any scope'd rifle falling off a bench and hitting concrete can cause any number of things to break on the gun or scope. It depends how the gun lands. I would say if you performed a test ([:'(]) say 10 drops with Leupold and Tasco the Tasco would fail more often. Besides you can send in the Leupold even if it is in pieces and they will repair or replace it.

The only scopes I have saw with wavy reticles have been Bushnell and Tasco.

Aim Straight,
NBH
neweboarhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2004 | 10:16 AM
  #14  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

Ive got a simple cure for this. Save your money. Dont waste it now. Save up and buy a scope that will last you years down the road. I went from a simmons redfield 3x9x32 (hated it) saved up and went to the new VX-III, thats the best thing I have ever done. Now I have a scope I know will last. Your going to buy a $100 scope and be pleased with it for awhile, then later you will have extra money to invest into a better scope and wish you had something to do with that old trashco. Im speaking from experience. You would be happier saving and waiting on that perfect scope
texasaggiebowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-2004 | 11:15 AM
  #15  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

If he has to wait a year or two to save for a 400 dollar scope, Should he just say the hell with hunting until then? I would have had to skip many years to come up with that much money. Many people I know will never have the money to spare to buy a 400.00 dollar scope. I had 30 or 35 years of great hunting before I could buy a Luepold. My Bushnells performed to perfection for all of those years. I am glad I didn't waste those years setting home because I could not afford a high dollar scope. I quess its his choice, I would buy a GOOD 100.00 scope (of which there are many) and get on with hunting. I can't afford 200.00 boots either but I can walk well without them. Same difference.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-2004 | 07:41 AM
  #16  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Lethbridge, Alberta
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

First stay away from the 50mm. Then i agree with james b's bushnell trophy. I love those. I have had them on rifles up to my .300 win mag, a .338 win mag, and a .50 cal knight rifle. They all stood up to the recoil without a hitch. My theory is this: i could save and buy a really nice high end scope. Then I drop my gun down a mountain. If it's abuse like that, no company, with the exception of Swaravski Optik and thats a maybe, will warranty that. The trophy still has a lifetime warranty against defects. So if I did have a problem, just send it back. (As long as it's not abused) They will take care of it. Plus, the optics really are not bad for the money, and the amber coatings help to enhace light transmission and show brown and grey colours a little brighter.
pharaoh2 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-2004 | 09:25 AM
  #17  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: chiefland Florida USA
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

each to his or her own.you truly get what you pay for.if you like Tasco and want it then buy it.
I personally have 5 Tasco world class on my rifles,two 22 , 2-243 rem and one 243 Browning.never had a problem with any.one fell out of the truck and skinned the h$ll out of the scope and never lost the sight in.

some may like them and some may not.you have to go with your first thoughts.
Tree climber is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-2004 | 11:01 AM
  #18  
eldeguello's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

ORIGINAL: BENOUTHUNTIN

I have $100 to spend on a scope. It needs to be a 50mm bell. How come?? I would like fully multi coated but I think that I am asking for to much. Yes, you are!! Please help. It will have to last for a couple of years. What you put it on will determine this!! If you put it on a .375 H&H or larger, don't expect too much!! Any comments would be appreciated.
eldeguello is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2004 | 10:40 PM
  #19  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, GA
Default RE: Is the Tasco 3-12X50 good for the MONEY

Ben, IMO I do think you are asking too much. I also think you should just go with a 40mm front lens unless you are going to use it for varmints. Spend as much as you can justify on getting quality glass and multi-coated lenses, and get a scope from a company that will back up their warranty. I personally do not like a Tasco for a big game rifle because I have seen several go bad. I would hate to have a hunt ruined because a scope failed.
However, only you know what you can afford, and what you really want. Good Luck

P.S. Be careful with used scopes. Most of them are being sold because somebody didn't like them. And a good one will still probably be more than your $100 dollar figure.
Big Al C is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2004 | 11:17 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Likes: 0
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skorte
Bowhunting
9
11-22-2006 05:25 PM
chuckclear2000
Firearm Review Forum
3
02-22-2006 05:22 PM
bc buck
Wanted
0
01-09-2005 08:09 PM
Oldguy
Bowhunting Gear Review
13
03-14-2004 09:55 AM
Pops423
Northeast
5
01-24-2002 01:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.