Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Are there any down sides to the 260 rem? >

Are there any down sides to the 260 rem?

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Are there any down sides to the 260 rem?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-20-2011, 04:28 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MB.
Posts: 2,984
Default

The 260 Rem. is an excellent cartridge rifle. Short action, and easy on the shoulder. I've been reloading some 140 Gr. Accubonds with very good results...
trailer is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:11 PM
  #12  
Typical Buck
 
HatchieLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West TN
Posts: 847
Default

Only "downside" I can think of with the 260 is the low options you have with factory ammo for that caliber. But if you're handloading it, you have plenty of options. Power and accuracy wise, it's just like it's other 308Win family members (243 and 7mm-08) they typically are among the most accurate calibers. A little more umph and bullet size than the 243 and little less recoil than the 308. It never really took off because I think it was surrounded by such great company (the 243 and 7mm-08) but that doesn't mean it was a bad caliber.

Good luck,
HL
HatchieLuvr is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 09:53 AM
  #13  
Spike
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 11
Default

The 260 is a wonderful killing machine, I have 3 at this time and have taken deer from 20yards to over 300 yards with no problems. My 9yr. old son and daugther both killed their first deer with the 260 last year and it worked as well for them as it has for me. I wouldn't let ammo push you away from the 260... Midway shows some 20 plus different types at this time.
deputydad is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 06:23 AM
  #14  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by HatchieLuvr
Only "downside" I can think of with the 260 is the low options you have with factory ammo for that caliber. But if you're handloading it, you have plenty of options. Power and accuracy wise, it's just like it's other 308Win family members (243 and 7mm-08) they typically are among the most accurate calibers. A little more umph and bullet size than the 243 and little less recoil than the 308. It never really took off because I think it was surrounded by such great company (the 243 and 7mm-08) but that doesn't mean it was a bad caliber.

Good luck,
HL
I remember all the fanfare when the 260 came out. It was going to be the next big deerslayer. However, as you said, it just never caught on. It seems an excellent alternative for someone who wants to minimze recoil. I would like to see it promoted again.

Contrarily, the WSMs, inspite of serving no new purpose and probably should not have had much appeal, survive and prosper. You never know. I guess some of it is in the advertising stamina of the manufacturer. That is, how determined they are to make a success of something.
Big Bullets is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 08:14 PM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
Jeff Ovington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,832
Default

Nothing wrong with the .260 Rem.. I been wanting a 6.5X284 for a few years now.. The .260 Rem along with modern day premium bullets is an excellent choice for deer antelope sheep goat, one of my Dads freinds and hunting partners ( who is pushing 64) uses a 6.5x.284 on his 10,000 ft Elk and deer hunts now , just cause his age is limiting the amount he can carry, and the recoil factor with a lighter weight firearm..He has no problems dumping bigger size game animals either.These are a great hunting caliber..
Jeff Ovington is offline  
Old 09-24-2011, 10:36 PM
  #16  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: michigan
Posts: 107
Default

the only hang up i can foresee would be ammo , unless u reload its not a common store shelf item good luc
polaris754 is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 10:40 AM
  #17  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default

You may consider the 6.5mm-284 Norma 142gr@3000fps, short action, no belt.

Savage chambers rifles it. So does ER Shaw.

I'd take the 7mm-08 over the .260 simply due to popularity.

There's the 270wsm also as an option.
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 02:34 AM
  #18  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 204
Default

The only down side I can see for the .260 is case capacity is lowered once you load the heavier bullets. The 6.5x55 has the advantage there. Other than that the .260 is a great all around hunting caliber. You have the sierra 85gr varmiter bullets all the way up to 160gr Hornady bullets for reloading.
Palladin8 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.