Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
.300 Win. Mag.  Ideal finished rifle weight... >

.300 Win. Mag. Ideal finished rifle weight...

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.300 Win. Mag. Ideal finished rifle weight...

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-18-2011, 02:27 PM
  #1  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 442
Default .300 Win. Mag. Ideal finished rifle weight...

Just looking for opinions on this.....

If you were building an "all around" North American rifle in .300 Win. Mag., what would you folks like the UNSCOPED rifle to weigh?

Consider a combination of deer hunting out of a box stand. Still hunting throught timber for deer, or elk. ect.

Not really expecting to be climbing up and down mountains where an ultra lightweight rifle would be needed.

I'm in the very last stages of my Hill Country Rifle being finished, and they recently completed a setup just like mine that wound up tipping the scales at 7lbs. 10oz. unscoped with no sling or ammo.

Would you folks prefer "your" .300 Winny to be lighter? Heavier?

All opinions welcomed.........
schoolcraft is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 03:23 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default

Mine is a Ruger #1 B and it's no lightweight. I believe it's about 8.25 lbs. naked.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 03:52 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default

10# totally finished would be nice, so maybe 8.75# rifle alone...
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 05:07 PM
  #4  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 442
Default

Thanks guys,

Keep the opinions coming!

I really thought I was going to get a "DANG that's going to be a heavy rifle to carry around"!!!

Sounds like mine will be a shade lighter than either of the ones listed so far.

Thanks for the input
schoolcraft is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 05:36 PM
  #5  
Typical Buck
 
Anthony T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 781
Default

An all around rifle for me would have a graphite composite stock and a medium sporter barrel. 300 mag I would want a 24-26" barrel. Hopefully you would be able to have that bare around 8-9lbs.
I really would not want any magnum caliber under 8 lbs. 7.5lbs maybe. Don't want to loose accuracy or develope flinches through heavy recoil.
Anthony T. is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 06:52 PM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
Default

I don't think any of mine are under 10lbs set up ready to hunt...
jeepkid is offline  
Old 08-18-2011, 08:29 PM
  #7  
Giant Nontypical
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 5,130
Default

My Sako A7 in 7MM RM is 6.9 lbs

My X-Bolt in .338WM is 6 lbs 13 oz.


No mountains ???
Sheridan is offline  
Old 08-19-2011, 06:51 AM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,320
Default

Mine is a 'full up' Sendero and probably goes around 11.5 lb ready to hunt with, certainly not light but I am used to carrying it and its very comfortable to shoot. If I were to go light/ultra light I'd be looking at 7 lbs without a scope , mounts, rings, strap, ammo etc. I just wouldn't go out and shoot off a couple of boxes of ammo like I can do with my Sendero.

As a general rule elk hunting involves at least some mountains...not always.

Last edited by skb2706; 08-19-2011 at 06:57 AM.
skb2706 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.