BULLETS-Dimes bit of difference
#1
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
I read all the posts that hunters put up on the new bullet or the next generation bullet or the best hunting bullet. I also read with interest about how it is the shot that counts. Then other people say you have to have a "better" bullet if you hunt with a 22 caliber. Now I believe Barnes has a new bullet out that costs 2or3 dollars a piece!!
I realize bullet construction is important if you are hunting large or dangerous game(elk sized and up). But for the average day in day out varmint and deer hunter I just do not think these expensive bullets are necessary.
Can someone please explain to me why the plain old Sierra or Hornady hunting bullet is no longer any good? I just can not understand the need to buy these expensive bullets. Heck I kill a bunch of deer every year with a bullet I cast out of straight Wheel Weight. I guess this is wrong also??
Why don't hunters just use an adequate caliber(I consider that to be 30 caliber), with a good bullet and spend their money on a better scope?? If recoil is a problem then shoot something smaller, but not much smaller. Or just load a larger cartridge down.
I read all the posts about hunter's wanting to use the 223 for deer hunting, or the 22 Hornet?? I am pretty sure those are varmint rounds, not deer rounds.
I would like for some one to show me some actual proof that a $2 bullet will kill a deer better than a plain old Siera Game King. Especially when shot out of an adequate deer cartridge, not a diminutive one. Tom.
I realize bullet construction is important if you are hunting large or dangerous game(elk sized and up). But for the average day in day out varmint and deer hunter I just do not think these expensive bullets are necessary.
Can someone please explain to me why the plain old Sierra or Hornady hunting bullet is no longer any good? I just can not understand the need to buy these expensive bullets. Heck I kill a bunch of deer every year with a bullet I cast out of straight Wheel Weight. I guess this is wrong also??
Why don't hunters just use an adequate caliber(I consider that to be 30 caliber), with a good bullet and spend their money on a better scope?? If recoil is a problem then shoot something smaller, but not much smaller. Or just load a larger cartridge down.
I read all the posts about hunter's wanting to use the 223 for deer hunting, or the 22 Hornet?? I am pretty sure those are varmint rounds, not deer rounds.
I would like for some one to show me some actual proof that a $2 bullet will kill a deer better than a plain old Siera Game King. Especially when shot out of an adequate deer cartridge, not a diminutive one. Tom.
#4
Hunting has so much media poisoning its veins that even the toughest hunters think that they will look cooler with the $45 box of bullets and the newest version of realtree with UV protection.
#6
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Likes: 0
Nothing wrong with a CoreLokt on deer...I've killed about 90 of so with it, out of my .243...When it comes to the .22 centerfires and deer, when you go from say a 55gr bullet made for groundhogs to a 60gr Nosler Partition made for deer then you go from a bullet that fragments to a bullet that mushrooms, stays together and gives full penetration on center lung shots...So it makes the .22 calibers more effective on larger game...
#7
It's called America! Choices, personal preferences, bigger and better.....etc....
I personally like new technology. I could still be driving to work in my Nova w/ no AC and an eight track but I prefer driving in my new F-150 with AC and Satellite Radio. Nothing wrong with using new technology and there's nothing wrong sticking with the old. But there's no reason to be critical if the other guy does not like the same as you.
I personally like new technology. I could still be driving to work in my Nova w/ no AC and an eight track but I prefer driving in my new F-150 with AC and Satellite Radio. Nothing wrong with using new technology and there's nothing wrong sticking with the old. But there's no reason to be critical if the other guy does not like the same as you.
#8
ORIGINAL: Old/New
How were all those deer killed years back? Must have been a lot of lucky shots with those poor bullets.
How were all those deer killed years back? Must have been a lot of lucky shots with those poor bullets.
Personal hygiene has come a long way..... most of the old timers just uglied them to death.
#9
ORIGINAL: HEAD0001
I read all the posts that hunters put up on the new bullet or the next generation bullet or the best hunting bullet. I also read with interest about how it is the shot that counts. Then other people say you have to have a "better" bullet if you hunt with a 22 caliber. Now I believe Barnes has a new bullet out that costs 2or3 dollars a piece!!
I read all the posts that hunters put up on the new bullet or the next generation bullet or the best hunting bullet. I also read with interest about how it is the shot that counts. Then other people say you have to have a "better" bullet if you hunt with a 22 caliber. Now I believe Barnes has a new bullet out that costs 2or3 dollars a piece!!
I realize bullet construction is important if you are hunting large or dangerous game(elk sized and up). But for the average day in day out varmint and deer hunter I just do not think these expensive bullets are necessary.
Can someone please explain to me why the plain old Sierra or Hornady hunting bullet is no longer any good? I just can not understand the need to buy these expensive bullets. Heck I kill a bunch of deer every year with a bullet I cast out of straight Wheel Weight. I guess this is wrong also??

Why don't hunters just use an adequate caliber(I consider that to be 30 caliber), with a good bullet and spend their money on a better scope?? If recoil is a problem then shoot something smaller, but not much smaller. Or just load a larger cartridge down.
I read all the posts about hunter's wanting to use the 223 for deer hunting, or the 22 Hornet?? I am pretty sure those are varmint rounds, not deer rounds.
I would like for some one to show me some actual proof that a $2 bullet will kill a deer better than a plain old Siera Game King. Especially when shot out of an adequate deer cartridge, not a diminutive one. Tom.
I read all the posts about hunter's wanting to use the 223 for deer hunting, or the 22 Hornet?? I am pretty sure those are varmint rounds, not deer rounds.
I would like for some one to show me some actual proof that a $2 bullet will kill a deer better than a plain old Siera Game King. Especially when shot out of an adequate deer cartridge, not a diminutive one. Tom.
#10
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
ORIGINAL: White-tail-deer
It's called America! Choices, personal preferences, bigger and better.....etc....
I personally like new technology. I could still be driving to work in my Nova w/ no AC and an eight track but I prefer driving in my new F-150 with AC and Satellite Radio. Nothing wrong with using new technology and there's nothing wrong sticking with the old. But there's no reason to be critical if the other guy does not like the same as you.
It's called America! Choices, personal preferences, bigger and better.....etc....
I personally like new technology. I could still be driving to work in my Nova w/ no AC and an eight track but I prefer driving in my new F-150 with AC and Satellite Radio. Nothing wrong with using new technology and there's nothing wrong sticking with the old. But there's no reason to be critical if the other guy does not like the same as you.
I am not saying you are wrong. Well I am about your F-150. Your F-150 is definitely not new technology.
But I am talking about bullets. What makes this new bullet tecnology better?? That is all I am asking. How can you prove they are better?? Personally I do not believe you can prove they are better, but I am open to suggestions.
And as far as putting a 60 grain partition in a 22 caliber cartridge?? Why?? It still does not make the 22 caliber a deer rifle?? Economics?? Maybe, if you can not afford a second rifle?? But it is definitely not nominal, it is just barely capable. And I honestly doubt the 60 grain partition is any better for deer than what a 60 grain Sierra is?? Or a 75 grain Hornady?? But it definitely costs more.


