Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 270 win VS. 270 WSM >

270 win VS. 270 WSM

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

270 win VS. 270 WSM

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-26-2006, 01:20 AM
  #11  
Typical Buck
 
Catus Magnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 501
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

Get a 30/30 and sneak a little closer?
Catus Magnus is offline  
Old 11-26-2006, 03:22 PM
  #12  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

ORIGINAL: ejpaul1

Allrighty then, I havent posted in a while and since such time have taken an antelope and 2 whitetail. My problem is that the 243 of mine ( an NEF ) sometimes wont eject shells making it unusable as a hunting rifle. I have used my 30-06 for all the hunting this year, but the lousy thing just rips a three inch hole through the animals destroying too much meat. I want a 270, but cant quite decide which flavor to get it in. It seems the WSM has the edge with over all performance, but reloading seems like it could be difficult since the shoulder angle is so extreme. As well, I think WSM loads are compressed. Please, brandish unabashed opinion on the matter. I dont need another rifle, I just want one. EJ
Could be compressed loads. You can get compressed loads for any round. Depends on the powder you pick. Has nothing to do with the round. I recommend H4831sc. If you use H1000, sure it can be compressed. Or even RL22 can be a compressed load. Also shoulder angle will not have any effect on reloading. Only feeding.
 
Old 11-27-2006, 06:30 PM
  #13  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: northern colorado
Posts: 749
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

Do you think if I bought a regular 270 win that I could squeeze 3200 fps out of some bot-tail ballistic tips? I wouldnt mind a magnum but I already have the reloading dies and some bullets for the 270 win. What do you think BC?
ejpaul1 is offline  
Old 11-27-2006, 07:23 PM
  #14  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

ORIGINAL: ejpaul1

Do you think if I bought a regular 270 win that I could squeeze 3200 fps out of some bot-tail ballistic tips? I wouldnt mind a magnum but I already have the reloading dies and some bullets for the 270 win. What do you think BC?
I doubt it. I haven't been able too accuratly. I have yet to see anyone get 3200fps with 130gr bullets. I seen a sendero with a 26" barrel get 3100 with H4831sc and very accurately.
 
Old 11-28-2006, 02:40 AM
  #15  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

From my 270 Win. The 130 grain Fusions clock 2860 fps. However thats gods plenty as anything they hit is down in its tracks. I only load my 270 WSM to 3050 FPS. I could get more but its so accurate with that load that who needs more. Like BC, I have found that 3100 is really pushing a 130 from the 270 and most factory loads fall well short of that.
James B is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:41 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

ORIGINAL: James B

I have found that 3100 is really pushing a 130 from the 270 and most factory loads fall well short of that.
Most factory loads don't even claim 3000 with the 130 Gr. do they?
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:41 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

ORIGINAL: Chantecler111

ORIGINAL: James B

I have found that 3100 is really pushing a 130 from the 270 and most factory loads fall well short of that.
Most factory loads don't even claim 3000 with the 130 Gr. do they?
Nevermind.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 07:37 AM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,205
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

You need to pay more attention to the type of bullet you use if you are having too much meat destruction. Uses a heavier onstructed bullet and the problem will be solved. All the rounds you are considering have the potential to mess up game with light bullets. I see no reason a plain old .270 wouldn't drop any deer any where.
TerryM is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 07:50 AM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,429
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

Go with the WSM it is a real winner. It will never surplant the 270 win just because of the years of experience, but its superior in everyway. Reloading is a breeze. Alliants R19 is the powder that mine likes. I'm pushing 150 gr. pills at 3000 + FPS and shooting them into .75 MOA Thats a whole lot of punch in an accurate package.
ShatoDavis is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 10:23 AM
  #20  
Typical Buck
 
Garminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 813
Default RE: 270 win VS. 270 WSM

Go with the wsm, superior round!!! now if you already had a 270 win I don't think that it would be necessary to change to a wsm.
Garminator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.