Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Ballistically speaking.....

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-24-2006 | 01:25 AM
  #11  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: Ballistically speaking.....

This is not to say that there is no advantage to the high velocity Magnums. However these midrange calibers plain and simply have about all the range and accuracy that the average hunter can take advantage of. I have been an avid if not rabid hunter for 50 some years. I can count the times on one hand that I had to try a shot of over 400 yards at an animal. A ten or twelve inch kill zone on a big game animal is a very, very small target at 500 yards and beyond.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-2006 | 08:03 AM
  #12  
eldeguello's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Default RE: Ballistically speaking.....





[blockquote]quote:

ORIGINAL: JagMagMan

.....the 7MM-08 would be darn near the perfect cartridge for game through Mule deer size.[/blockquote]

Yep. Almost, but not quite, as good as the 7X57mm Mauser!

_______________________





eldeguello is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-2006 | 09:34 AM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
Default RE: Ballistically speaking.....

First and most important, shoot a caliber and rifle that you are comfortable with. Remember recoil is a personal thing, throw away your computers and your charts, and shoot your rifle. Also different rifles in the same caliber canhave different felt recoil. Make sure your rifle fits properly!!! Now to caliber, sorry guys but bigger is always better(as long as you the shooter can manage the recoil). A 308 caliber will outperform a 284 which will outperform a 277, which will outperform.........I am not attacking anyone who has responded to this thread, it is obvious most of you guys know what you are talking about. What I have noticed at our club is that most shooters who claim to know what their rifles can do at 500 yards, have never shot at 500 yards, and probably could not hit a bull in the butt at that distance, but they sure can quote that drop. I have shot over 100 deer, and been around the shooting of probably over 500. Believe me 30 caliber is king. Tom.
HEAD0001 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-2006 | 09:40 AM
  #14  
Rebel Hog's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 26,323
Likes: 0
From: WC FL
Default RE: Ballistically speaking.....

I guess you know what I shoot, but like the 7mm-08 also!
Rebel Hog is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-2006 | 10:29 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Default RE: Ballistically speaking.....

Regarding the "on topic part"....

Yep. Almost, but not quite, as good as the 7X57mm Mauser!


================================================== =

Regarding the off topic part above regarding getting "caught up" in things....

Lets get caught up in field position shooting skill (not benchrest/blindrest) AND cartridge selection for the job at hand, tempered by how many shots ata greatanimal you are willing to pass on because of rifle limitations (in real life, not internet chat) AND acknowledge what your accuracy deviation factoris (in reallife, not internet chat)on shots taken from field position shooting (not benchrest/blindrest).

What do your ocassional "outlier" shots look like? How often to they happen? How far off are they? Field positions now, do you ALWAYS know when the shot you are about to take is going to be perfect? If not, then what compensating elements do you use to buy yourself (and your quarry) some insurance?This is anot-so-simplistic world.

Of course you have to hit what you are shooting at! That is the elementary starting point for any hunting. No rocket science there, it is a given. The discussion moves forward (or not) from there.

Consider working with the "whole picture" rather than just focusing on a singleaspect whileignoring the balance.
ELKampMaster is offline  
Reply
Old 09-03-2006 | 12:28 AM
  #16  
Anthony T.'s Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ballistically speaking.....

Another good post^ Im with ELKampmaster. You know that anything between 243 on up to whatever is adequate for deer. Just find something you like and that fits you good with tolerable recoil. Then you're ready to hunt.
Anthony T. is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DeerandbearhoG
Guns
10
12-04-2008 05:50 PM
Semisane
Black Powder
6
11-19-2008 08:46 AM
JagMagMan
Guns
2
08-24-2006 08:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.