RifleScopes.com follow up
#21
He said he would take them back and give me a refund and didn't, period. If they fit, I would be saying they were great. They didn't fit, I returned them, and it's the promised refund I have a problem with. They came on time for sure, but I never hada problem with that.
#22
Hey RifleScopes.com dude: Will Leupold sun shades fit on Bushnell and/or Redfield scopes? I'm in need of a couple of shades, but can only find Leupolds. Haven't found any specifically made for Bushnell or Redfield. Thanks!
#23
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
From:
If the rings did not fit why not put them back into the original packaging right away?? Why get all pissy over a couple of dollars? Why try and return the rings? You ar a buddy will need them in the future. The cost of return shipping makes them a junk drawer item. I have a New, In The Box set of Burris Dual Dovetail Signature Rings that I purchased thinking my XP-100 had dual dovetails. When I discovered it did not the rings went to my scope ring box for future use or trade bait.
The rings purchased were the rings the buyer wanted and ordered. Why not start a pissing match with the barrel supplier?
The rings purchased were the rings the buyer wanted and ordered. Why not start a pissing match with the barrel supplier?
#24
When I first got them I took them out to see how the inserts fit in the rings. I put them back in the dimpled end and somehow lost the other side to the packaging. I could have lied too and said I sent the entire packaging back, but I don't lie.
I edited out that last sentence of my last post because my whole intention of posting was for you guys in this forum.If my motive was the money and not being lied to, I would have pleadedwith them to honor their promise and not exposed the service on this forum.
OK, that was my final post.
I edited out that last sentence of my last post because my whole intention of posting was for you guys in this forum.If my motive was the money and not being lied to, I would have pleadedwith them to honor their promise and not exposed the service on this forum.
OK, that was my final post.

#26
SOMEONE is lying here! I've only had one experience with Riflescopes.com, and it was a good one!
True, right is right, and wrong is wrong! So I won't even bother trying to figure out who is right or wrong!
I am not trying to trivalize right and wrong, or money for that matter!
BUT, in this case, I'd have to say that BOTH sides are WRONG, and go about my business!
There is not enough money involved for the effort that EITHER side is putting out over this matter!
Again, I realize right and wrong, AND that PRINCIPLE is more VALUABLE than actual money involved, but in this case, BOTH sides are becomming MORE WRONG, with each passing shot!
SOMETIMES it IS actually better to just "let it slide!"
True, right is right, and wrong is wrong! So I won't even bother trying to figure out who is right or wrong!
I am not trying to trivalize right and wrong, or money for that matter!
BUT, in this case, I'd have to say that BOTH sides are WRONG, and go about my business!
There is not enough money involved for the effort that EITHER side is putting out over this matter!
Again, I realize right and wrong, AND that PRINCIPLE is more VALUABLE than actual money involved, but in this case, BOTH sides are becomming MORE WRONG, with each passing shot!
SOMETIMES it IS actually better to just "let it slide!"
#27
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
From:
Over a small ammount of money you attempted to trash a good company.
It appears you have trashed yourself with your efforts.
I hope people read more than the headline of this thread
It appears you have trashed yourself with your efforts.
I hope people read more than the headline of this thread




