How the .243 stacks up (part deux)
#121
RE: How the .243 stacks up (part deux)
ORIGINAL: bigcountry
Oops, I meant 21.31" of drift and 42.18" of drop with 200 yard zero. Guess I am the dufis.
Look at the tables again. Number right on.
Oops, I meant 21.31" of drift and 42.18" of drop with 200 yard zero. Guess I am the dufis.
Look at the tables again. Number right on.
#122
RE: How the .243 stacks up (part deux)
ORIGINAL: bigcountry
I did dufis, I edited my post. See above.
but I am curious, why does it matter so much to you? Is this your first rifle?
I did dufis, I edited my post. See above.
but I am curious, why does it matter so much to you? Is this your first rifle?
No, not my first rodeo.
#124
RE: How the .243 stacks up (part deux)
ORIGINAL: bigcountry
Then why do you care what these people think of you? Your probably never going to meet them?
Then why do you care what these people think of you? Your probably never going to meet them?
#126
RE: How the .243 stacks up (part deux)
Got a question regarding the barrel lengths for both the M700 BDL and Ruger MKII both chambered in .243. I see they are in 22" barrels. I always like my rifles with at least a 24" bbl. I'm looking at the Weatherby Vanguard because of the 24" barrel. Should the shorter 22" barrel really be a concern in .243 win?
Thanks.
Thanks.
#128
RE: How the .243 stacks up (part deux)
You probably won't see a difference. You will gain 25-40 fps per inch of barrel. In the field this won't show up much. There is sometimes no difference in velocity by changing barrel lenghts. I prefer 24 inch barrels but I don't think the 243 suffers much by dropping to 22. It does not have a greart amount of powedr to burn.