Dura-Coat Camo
#21
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,263
RE: Dura-Coat Camo
I agree, painting them makes them difficult to sell. For the majority of my guns, I don't look at them as investments - they're just tools. I take good care of my tools, but residual value isn't important to me. I'm not convinced dipping increases the value of the gun, other than in the owners mind. What percentage of the dipping cost do they recover when they sell these dipped guns? If the purpose of dipping is to increase value, why not gold plate them? I maintain my arguement that the purpose of camo is to break up the pattern - nothing more, nothing less and if I do that for $5 I've acomplished the same thing as someone spending $200. I can put the $195 into a better scope, ammo, new boots, etc.
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Dura-Coat Camo
rick, alot of us, I know I do really admire a nice looking weapon. I know mossy likes a nice neat professional looking pattern. I am not a big fan of camo guns other than turkey hunting and duck hunting.
Us who enjoys a nice deep blueing and nice wood grain are not as rare as you think. I would bet you are an extreme minority. Nothing wrong with a little vanity.
Us who enjoys a nice deep blueing and nice wood grain are not as rare as you think. I would bet you are an extreme minority. Nothing wrong with a little vanity.
#23
RE: Dura-Coat Camo
What's the purpose of camo'ing a rifle?
You can do it for $200, or you can do it for $5
I assure you the amount of money you choose to spend doesn't make any difference to the animals we hunt
#24
RE: Dura-Coat Camo
ORIGINAL: rick_reno
I agree, painting them makes them difficult to sell. For the majority of my guns, I don't look at them as investments - they're just tools.
I agree, painting them makes them difficult to sell. For the majority of my guns, I don't look at them as investments - they're just tools.