Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

Tikka T3 Hunter Magnums

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-30-2003 | 06:19 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: MN USA
Default Tikka T3 Hunter Magnums

Has anyone seen or tried out one of the new Tikka T3 Hunter rifles in a magnum (i.e. 300 Win Mag)?

Is the weight of 6 lbs. 13 oz. compared to prior year Hunter models of 7 lbs. 4 oz. a significant factor in recoil for magnum calibers like 300 WM?

Or if you had a choice between the Tikka models, would you stay with with their Whitetail Hunter Deluxe, which is still 7 lbs. 4 oz. and has the classic styling?

MinnFinn

MinnFinn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-2003 | 06:02 PM
  #2  
Power's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: E. Washington State
Default RE: Tikka T3 Hunter Magnums

I just bought a Tikka Whitetail Hunter M695, stainless, laminated stock.

It' s heavy.

I love it. Haven' t even shot her yet but the weight is well balanced and it looks nice while still retaining enough weatherproof-ness. Probably should have weilded a T3 just to compare but they still don' t have any in stock here in town to look at. Had them order my rifle and they had it in 2 days. Got a great price on it too.
Power is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-2003 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Goleta CA USA
Default RE: Tikka T3 Hunter Magnums

MinnFinn,

I' d go with the lighter of the two. What' s at stake? 7oz.? Not much..

I bought one of the 695 Tikka' s in synthetic blue.. 300 win mag. It' s a shooter but it' s still heavy as hell. 5 days into hunting the west and my sholder was killin me from the sling cut (combined with the backpack). The recoil difference between the 7 ounces would be nothing... but then, I don' t flinch with recoil - especially with game in front of me.
BTRACK is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2003 | 05:36 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: MN USA
Default RE: Tikka T3 Hunter Magnums

BTRACK - That' s sort of what I was thinking. It would depend upon how much you had to carry it or any firearm around up and down the mountains or wherever. I was told by the gunsmith at a recent sportsmans' show that the lighter weight will kick a bit more. But I figure, aside from sighting it in, I would only hope to shoot 1 or 2 times during the season, if I do it right. It would be good not to have to carry anymore weight than necessary. Although less than a pound difference may not make that much difference.

I just was sure if there were any other significant changes that were a positive or negative anyone new about. I' ll probably try to go to a shop that has the whitetail hunter and T3 in stock, if I can and feel the difference in weight, feel, balance, etc.

Thanks for the thoughts folks!

MinnFinn
MinnFinn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-2003 | 10:32 PM
  #5  
Power's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: E. Washington State
Default RE: Tikka T3 Hunter Magnums

BTW, the Hunter is listed at 8 lbs. and I believe them. The T3 is listed (in mag. cal.) 7.5 lbs.

I thought there would be more difference but a .5 lbs. I' ll keep my laminated rifle.
Power is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
schwamp_buck
Guns
5
07-10-2009 09:45 AM
ShaggyPA
Guns
6
11-14-2008 07:24 AM
Todd1700
Guns
3
05-16-2004 09:33 AM
Back40
Guns
3
02-03-2004 03:26 PM
drh1175
Guns
13
09-03-2003 11:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.