Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

30-06 vs. 270 WSM

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-01-2008, 03:36 PM
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 866
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

I said it before and I will say it again! There ain't nothin' that a 160 grain 7mm Rem Mag cannot do..

Go with the 7 Mag, it is a happy median..
Dozen Arrows is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 07:58 PM
  #22  
Fork Horn
 
Dalebow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 264
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

Somebody doesnt like the 30TC:-(

a 165 gr 30 TC will kill anything in North America but likeI said I like the 270wsm
Dalebow is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 09:12 PM
  #23  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Garfield NJ USA
Posts: 3,067
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

Never said I didn't like the 30TC, just don't go giving it accolades that it has not earned or deserved. Will it ever be an 06, NO
thndrchiken is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:25 AM
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 163
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

I love the 30 caliber family but personally I would go with the 270wsm out of the two choices. I own an 06 but the 270wsm has alittle edge when you consider long range performance. I like the flattest shooting gun i can fire. I would also recommend the 300wsm. I just bought one 2 years ago and she is now my main squeeze.
tmeservey is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:54 AM
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

ORIGINAL: salukipv1

I have said the .300 wsm is the new .30-06, a great all around in my opinion.

For elk I like having the option of heavier bullets that the .30cal will allow, ie 180grs, vs. the .270 maxing out at 150grs, 160gr if you handload.

Personally I would get a .300wsm shoot 180grs for everything and call it a day.

I think for an all around I'd stick to either of those .30 calibers, since you didn't mention the .300wsm, my pick would be the .30-06, but if you add it to the mix, then my choice would become .300wsm.
I completely agree with you. I have one and like it a lot more than I thought I would. I use 150 E-tips for deer and 180 accubonds for larger game.
nickshultz is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 12:15 PM
  #26  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 281
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

I don't have a lot of experience with a lot of calibers. I have a Win. Model 70 in 270WSM. It's the stealth or shadow model with ablack composite stock. It's a light accurate rifle, especially withhand loads. It's flat shooting and from my experience at 100yds or less will drop a deer in it's tracks with a shot though the vitals. At least with this lighter weight model, it's not particulary fun at the range but I am a lanky guy with not a lot of shoulder. Shooting some lighter charge hand loads could fix that some. I bought mine from Wallmart for 4 something I believe. It was a good caliber, quality gun for a small budget. I have upgraded to a Burris Shortmag 4.5-14 scope and love it.
marshall9779 is offline  
Old 09-13-2008, 05:41 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 46
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

The world record elk was shot with a 6mm back in the day, nobody here has talked about shot placement and the type of bullet that is being used, as far as a guides are concened they would rather have you bring and shot a gun / cal / that you are comfertable shooting and accurate with than something that your are afraid to shot, SHOT PLACEMENT KILLS,
tbuck300wsm is offline  
Old 09-14-2008, 01:39 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 46
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

ok
tbuck300wsm is offline  
Old 09-14-2008, 02:42 PM
  #29  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,747
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

This debate as to which is better between the '06 and the 270 has been going on for decades.And the 270WSM is very close to the 270 Win.But to keep within the topic of this post and as much as I like my 270 - if you are going to have only one rifle and your choice is between these 2 chamberings, I would have to suggest the'06. The versitility has to go with the '06. There are simply more choices in bullet weights and a bullet in the 165 - 180 gr. will take anything in NA. Although it wouldn't be my first choice for big bears.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 09-14-2008, 06:08 PM
  #30  
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
Default RE: 30-06 vs. 270 WSM

Of the 2 mentioned the 06'. However like already mentioned by others I'd also choose the 7mm rem mag over either for this application. I've used .277, .284 & .308 cals(among others) for deer to moose and the 7mm rem mag is one that keeps coming back into my mix for an all arounder. The 300 is a solid all around choice as well.

BTW,I reload,shoot med long range (500 yards) and hunt larger then deer annually. I formedthe aboveopinion based on my experience.

Good luck
skeeter 7MM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.