What, no responses. NO justification as to why others should not be allowed to enjoy "bow" hunting with a disability?

I agree 100%

Burnie, go back, I responded several pages ago


quote:

I thought it went without saying that the guy that can no longer use a bow should be able to hunt with an xbow during archery season. That is already legal in most states, including mine.

Isn't he the same prick who kept raising his hand in school?

No.. he's the kid Suzy Rotten Crotch goes with.....

the seeds of reason have been planted and after all, 90 pages and I still haven't seen a single negative to allowing crossbows

ok, time top stop lying. I mean, really - there ARE NO GOOD REASONS to not allow crossbows. None. nada. zip. they don't exist

At best, compounds, they are bow-like, but they aren't the same .. so they get lumped outside with the rest of the non-archery gear.

Can that not be said and have some truth to it ? After all, compounds are nothing really like recurve/longbows at all, are they ? They aren't drawn the same, they don't have the same way to generate the energy to propel the arrow, one has high let off, the other no letoff, compounds have sights, multiple cables, cams/pulleys - they are bowlike but NOT bows !

WE agree on that - right ?

Well actually two. I think we recruited adams into the ranks while we were at it. But anyway you slice it that's two more than we had before we started and if they convince two a piece and they convince two a piece then we may just have a regular "Pay it Forward" on our hands

I agree your argument is fundemenatlly flawed but you fought the good fight anyway

You certainly can't if you don't fight it But i don't want to tightened the restrictions on compounds I just want some other folks to have a chance to be in the woods during archery season

I must have missed the reasons and apparently you must have missed the reasons that I listed why they should be allowed. But I don't think you did you just chose to ignore them. But I am not trying to transform them anyway. i agree there is a difference in the way shoot them but ultimately it's insignificant and there performance is nearly identical to that of a compound so for no more difference than there is and since you already told us very few people want to shoot them so that eliminates the worry of you loosing any time from your season I don't see why I should want to keep little johnny out of the woods.

That's right you set little Johnny straight on what it means to be a man

A pistol is not the same as a rifle either but they are typically allowed in the same season so I guess I missed the point.

I am bitter because I want other people to get a chance to enjoy the archery season. I guess I failed to see the logic behind that one

Data,

I think there are many people who think the same way I do....I just don't have a problem telling it like it is. I don't see a crossbow and anything other than another option when it comes to string fired weapons. To me that is what bows are I have said before and I will say it again a crossbow by it's very definition is a form of a bow. Different than a compound...yes but I still contend that it is no stranger than a crossbow is to a long bow.

If you bring to light the differences in one comparison why can't the differences be brought to light in the other?

I know they are differet but I contend they are both BIG differences in there own right and the one side should not be dismissed simply because they are different.

I say this because I think some of you are doing just that. If fact you have to, because to agree that the differences between compounds and long bows is just as great as the differences between compounds and crossbows albeit different shows hypocrisy.

Nah that was his cousin. Johnny is a pretty good kid

Tell Suzy the board says HI the next time you see her and don't be haten on Johnny becasue he took your woman[:-]

Sorry couldn't resist