What a bunch of garbage...
01-28-2009, 03:20 PM
#21
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 7,367
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: virginiashadow
Here is my scoring system..."oh man that looks like a nice rack", then I will attempt to shoot it.
Here is my scoring system..."oh man that looks like a nice rack", then I will attempt to shoot it.
Brett, I've used that one a lot! It works pretty good[8D]
Dan
01-28-2009, 03:33 PM
#22
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mont County, Pa
Posts: 7,368
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
01-28-2009, 03:49 PM
#23
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 7,367
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: early in
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
and..............a thick long tine would displace more water than a spindly long tine
Dan
01-28-2009, 03:56 PM
#24
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mont County, Pa
Posts: 7,368
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
Longer the tine, the more water it displaces
Dan
ORIGINAL: early in
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
Dan
Like I said,all you wouldget is a mass score.
01-28-2009, 04:05 PM
#25
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 7,367
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: early in
A longer skinny tine might displace the same amount of water as a shorter fatter tine, so there!Like I said,all you wouldget is a mass score.
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
Longer the tine, the more water it displaces
Dan
ORIGINAL: early in
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
The "water displacement" scoring method would only give a perfectoverall mass score, nothing else. You wouldn't have any tine/beam lenghts or any beam diameters. I don't think that method would bevery popular at all.
Dan
Like I said,all you wouldget is a mass score.
Well I guess you can argue about it, but Not with me![8D]
Dan
01-29-2009, 05:23 AM
#27
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,927
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
But what would be the mechanics of a water displacement score? Would you have to cut the rack off the skull cap? Because you cant include the skull cap in the measurements. If you kept the skull cap intact how would you measure antlers that are wide apart that would cause the skull cap to be submerged to submerge both antlers to the base? Distilled, spring, or tap water? What temperature would the water be and must all measurements take place at sea level? Inquiring minds want to know.
01-29-2009, 06:57 AM
#28
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mont County, Pa
Posts: 7,368
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: Talondale
But what would be the mechanics of a water displacement score? Would you have to cut the rack off the skull cap? Because you cant include the skull cap in the measurements. If you kept the skull cap intact how would you measure antlers that are wide apart that would cause the skull cap to be submerged to submerge both antlers to the base? Distilled, spring, or tap water? What temperature would the water be and must all measurements take place at sea level? Inquiring minds want to know.
But what would be the mechanics of a water displacement score? Would you have to cut the rack off the skull cap? Because you cant include the skull cap in the measurements. If you kept the skull cap intact how would you measure antlers that are wide apart that would cause the skull cap to be submerged to submerge both antlers to the base? Distilled, spring, or tap water? What temperature would the water be and must all measurements take place at sea level? Inquiring minds want to know.
01-29-2009, 07:23 AM
#29
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 341
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: fingerz42
bravo again you too are missing the point.. yes the two offer the same thing (a scoring system) btu in your analogy to be the same as what the buckmasters have done, the various burger joints would steal eachothers recipes and only change one ingredient so that ultimately they all sold the exact same burger..
I'm done with this because it seems alot of you are missing the point at hand and cant grasp fully what I've been trying to say..
bravo again you too are missing the point.. yes the two offer the same thing (a scoring system) btu in your analogy to be the same as what the buckmasters have done, the various burger joints would steal eachothers recipes and only change one ingredient so that ultimately they all sold the exact same burger..
I'm done with this because it seems alot of you are missing the point at hand and cant grasp fully what I've been trying to say..
01-29-2009, 07:44 AM
#30
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Eldred, PA
Posts: 1,667
RE: What a bunch of garbage...
ORIGINAL: Talondale
But what would be the mechanics of a water displacement score? Would you have to cut the rack off the skull cap? Because you cant include the skull cap in the measurements. If you kept the skull cap intact how would you measure antlers that are wide apart that would cause the skull cap to be submerged to submerge both antlers to the base? Distilled, spring, or tap water? What temperature would the water be and must all measurements take place at sea level? Inquiring minds want to know.
But what would be the mechanics of a water displacement score? Would you have to cut the rack off the skull cap? Because you cant include the skull cap in the measurements. If you kept the skull cap intact how would you measure antlers that are wide apart that would cause the skull cap to be submerged to submerge both antlers to the base? Distilled, spring, or tap water? What temperature would the water be and must all measurements take place at sea level? Inquiring minds want to know.
