Why do so many not know of the inner loins?
#61
ORIGINAL: NEW61375
This thread cracks me up, in the interest of not being wasteful I am assuming that most people that are critical here are using all the deer. Necks, ribs, stew meat cut from thehard to reach spots, etc. Hell don"t forget the heart, liver, tongue, orskin.A filipino friend of mine makes deer rinds out of the skin andswears they are the greatest thing on earth, I wouldn't know because I just wastethat part. Whatever I don't want I give away, whatever I don't see fit to process I feed my buddies hunting dogsor other random critters. What about the ham/front legmeat from the bend/knuckle to the hoof? There's a couple of small banana sized strips of meat there and I'm sure all you guys are using those every time, right? I mean that would be part of the 4 quarters.
I see...... we only have to use the meat the game book says, then you are not being wasteful and lazy, even though you could technically use almost every other part of the animal you want, the "book" doesn't say you have to.
Why wouldn't you process a small deer shoulder?
7mm or heavy buckshot damage.
Ever seen a shoulder that a broadhead stuck into and then the deer ran 100 or more yards with with the broadhead in there working, it's real nice.
This thread cracks me up, in the interest of not being wasteful I am assuming that most people that are critical here are using all the deer. Necks, ribs, stew meat cut from thehard to reach spots, etc. Hell don"t forget the heart, liver, tongue, orskin.A filipino friend of mine makes deer rinds out of the skin andswears they are the greatest thing on earth, I wouldn't know because I just wastethat part. Whatever I don't want I give away, whatever I don't see fit to process I feed my buddies hunting dogsor other random critters. What about the ham/front legmeat from the bend/knuckle to the hoof? There's a couple of small banana sized strips of meat there and I'm sure all you guys are using those every time, right? I mean that would be part of the 4 quarters.
I see...... we only have to use the meat the game book says, then you are not being wasteful and lazy, even though you could technically use almost every other part of the animal you want, the "book" doesn't say you have to.
Why wouldn't you process a small deer shoulder?
7mm or heavy buckshot damage.
Ever seen a shoulder that a broadhead stuck into and then the deer ran 100 or more yards with with the broadhead in there working, it's real nice.
I didn't ask why not process a small shot up shoulder (buckshot irrelevant here), i asked why not process a shoulder hit DEER?
Its like heating up a nice toasty poptart only to eat the edges...the best part is in the middle!
#62
original:NEW61375
see...... we only have to use the meat the game book says, then you are not being wasteful and lazy, even though you could technically use almost every other part of the animal you want, the "book" doesn't say you have to.
see...... we only have to use the meat the game book says, then you are not being wasteful and lazy, even though you could technically use almost every other part of the animal you want, the "book" doesn't say you have to.
No, NEW, you can eat the intestines and the eyeballs if you want, more power to you.
But it seems to me that the MINIMUM amount of the animal that should be reasonably attempted to be retreived for HUMAN consumption is that amount that is REQUIRED by law, at least in the three states where I hunt.
Are you suggesting that we should PICK and CHOOSE which game laws we are going to abide and which ones we aren't? If so, please enlighten me as to what other MINIMUM STANDARD game laws we should ignore and replace/substitute our own standards for in their place.
original:NEW61375Why wouldn't you process a small deer shoulder?
7mm or heavy buckshot damage.
Ever seen a shoulder that a broadhead stuck into and then the deer ran 100 or more yards with with the broadhead in there working, it's real nice
7mm or heavy buckshot damage.
Ever seen a shoulder that a broadhead stuck into and then the deer ran 100 or more yards with with the broadhead in there working, it's real nice
#64
Typical Buck
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From:
I take it back, I wont say it's LAZY per say, but as mentioned earlier, effort vs reward is too much to leave them, even if you have multiple deer a year. They just dont last long enough to not take.
#67
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: PA
the only thing that i found, is i usually take the tenderloyns, however, if you make a mistake gutting the deer, they seem to absorb the gut taste quickly, ive cooked them before and myself and others spit them out because the tasted like guts, thats why, im super careful when i field dress a deer... but sometimes you just plain goof up.... but yes they are good when not tainted...
#68
ORIGINAL: Schultzy
New,
What most people on here are saying Is don't waste what you shoot.
New,
What most people on here are saying Is don't waste what you shoot.
Why is that?
#70
ORIGINAL: jackflap
Okay....I won't leave this thread alone just yet.
No, NEW, you can eat the intestines and the eyeballs if you want, more power to you.
But it seems to me that the MINIMUM amount of the animal that should be reasonably attempted to be retreived for HUMAN consumption is that amount that is REQUIRED by law, at least in the three states where I hunt.
Are you suggesting that we should PICK and CHOOSE which game laws we are going to abide and which ones we aren't? If so, please enlighten me as to what other MINIMUM STANDARD game laws we should ignore and replace/substitute our own standards for in their place.
No one nor the law is referrring to damaged or tainted meat that is deemed not suitable for human consumption. Again most laws (and I can find more if you want) use words as "a reasonable attempt...."
original:NEW61375
see...... we only have to use the meat the game book says, then you are not being wasteful and lazy, even though you could technically use almost every other part of the animal you want, the "book" doesn't say you have to.
see...... we only have to use the meat the game book says, then you are not being wasteful and lazy, even though you could technically use almost every other part of the animal you want, the "book" doesn't say you have to.
No, NEW, you can eat the intestines and the eyeballs if you want, more power to you.
But it seems to me that the MINIMUM amount of the animal that should be reasonably attempted to be retreived for HUMAN consumption is that amount that is REQUIRED by law, at least in the three states where I hunt.
Are you suggesting that we should PICK and CHOOSE which game laws we are going to abide and which ones we aren't? If so, please enlighten me as to what other MINIMUM STANDARD game laws we should ignore and replace/substitute our own standards for in their place.
original:NEW61375Why wouldn't you process a small deer shoulder?
7mm or heavy buckshot damage.
Ever seen a shoulder that a broadhead stuck into and then the deer ran 100 or more yards with with the broadhead in there working, it's real nice
7mm or heavy buckshot damage.
Ever seen a shoulder that a broadhead stuck into and then the deer ran 100 or more yards with with the broadhead in there working, it's real nice
The point I was trying to make earlier is many don't use the ribs, neck, and scrap meat and that is just as wasteful if not more wasteful(quantity wise) than the inner loins. But people are saying "well it's not in the laws as a minimum" so what, that's ok? If yal say so, I just think it's a double standard. If Jeff didn't use some of his inner loins or fed his dog a shoulder I still know he proceesed and used a lot more venison than most and much of it went to very needy causes. And I'd be willing to bet that some that have posted on this very thread/site wasted more meat than a couple of inner loins in their hunting careers, hell probably last season for that matter. jmo
If I have to chucka inner loin this season I'll make sure to inform you so you can call the VDGIF and let them know of the "Game Law Violation"(in New Mexico anyway)and get me put on their top ten list.


