Check out this picture...
10-16-2008 | 08:40 AM
#91
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: zrexpilot
Ya has to be a rage blade, notice the little penetration, any other blade would be sticking in the ground. probably a mathews bow as well.
Ya has to be a rage blade, notice the little penetration, any other blade would be sticking in the ground. probably a mathews bow as well.
10-16-2008 | 02:10 PM
#93
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Check out this picture...
TOTALLY AGREE
ORIGINAL: AF Hunter
That picture appears to be superimposed. If it had not been, you would either not see through the deer like you can or the bottom of the deer would have been blurry from the movement.
That picture appears to be superimposed. If it had not been, you would either not see through the deer like you can or the bottom of the deer would have been blurry from the movement.
10-16-2008 | 02:14 PM
#94
Dominant Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 26,274
Likes: 0
From: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: AF Hunter
That picture appears to be superimposed. If it had not been, you would either not see through the deer like you can or the bottom of the deer would have been blurry from the movement.
That picture appears to be superimposed. If it had not been, you would either not see through the deer like you can or the bottom of the deer would have been blurry from the movement.
10-16-2008 | 02:18 PM
#95
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: West Tennessee
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: burniegoeasily
Its a magic deer. I found that odd too. Ive never shot a transparent deer.
ORIGINAL: AF Hunter
That picture appears to be superimposed. If it had not been, you would either not see through the deer like you can or the bottom of the deer would have been blurry from the movement.
That picture appears to be superimposed. If it had not been, you would either not see through the deer like you can or the bottom of the deer would have been blurry from the movement.
Besides, a lot of the people I know are pretty transparent. Why can't deer be the same way?
10-16-2008 | 02:23 PM
#97
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,702
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Michigan
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: bigtim6656
ya it looks fake. Not a good fake either heck i could do better and i am not that good at photoshop. Never saw asee through deer in the woods.
ya it looks fake. Not a good fake either heck i could do better and i am not that good at photoshop. Never saw asee through deer in the woods.
You are an idiot. period. You can't do better than an actual photo, tardcakes....imagine that
Ihave hadtransparent imageswith my $350 Fuji and my $900 Cannon, and have seen them off of many other cameras... Transparent images happen all the time!!!!!!!!
10-16-2008 | 02:59 PM
#99
Fork Horn
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: IOWA
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: Carpmaster
You are an idiot. period. You can't do better than an actual photo, tardcakes....imagine that
Ihave hadtransparent imageswith my $350 Fuji and my $900 Cannon, and have seen them off of many other cameras... Transparent images happen all the time!!!!!!!!
ORIGINAL: bigtim6656
ya it looks fake. Not a good fake either heck i could do better and i am not that good at photoshop. Never saw asee through deer in the woods.
ya it looks fake. Not a good fake either heck i could do better and i am not that good at photoshop. Never saw asee through deer in the woods.
You are an idiot. period. You can't do better than an actual photo, tardcakes....imagine that
Ihave hadtransparent imageswith my $350 Fuji and my $900 Cannon, and have seen them off of many other cameras... Transparent images happen all the time!!!!!!!!
Photo is legit in my opinion. I have also gotten trail cam photos with some transparency. It's not that uncommon.
tardcakes!!
not nice, but funny.