If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
#41
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
I have been hunting for over 30 years and would zip that buck with the sticker in the blink of an eye.
You shoot what you want and I'll shoot what I want is the Mantra of the day. That being said I don't shoot BB, spikes or forkhorns but would love to shoot the tall racked six I saw last year.
Whats wrong with shooting a yearling/fawn?? They eat fine and they are legal.
You shoot what you want and I'll shoot what I want is the Mantra of the day. That being said I don't shoot BB, spikes or forkhorns but would love to shoot the tall racked six I saw last year.
Whats wrong with shooting a yearling/fawn?? They eat fine and they are legal.
#43
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
original:kevin1
It's none of your damned business what someone else shoots, elitist a-holes like you piss me off, not everybody hunts for the same reasons you do jerrkoff. [:@]
It's none of your damned business what someone else shoots, elitist a-holes like you piss me off, not everybody hunts for the same reasons you do jerrkoff. [:@]
Easy there big fella.....might want to consider decaffinated.
It is my business when it is my farm and I have invited guests. You are still missing the point I am making. If you want to disagree, fine. Just make sure you know what you are disagreeing with.
All I am saying is if given a choice, and at our place we have enough deer that you do, don't shoot the 2 1/2 yo 8pts that are only 90-100" deer today, shoot the little 4 point or spike if you must (or want to), but leave the 2.5 yo alone.
Why is there anymore satisfaction in shooting the two 2.5 yo 8 pts I showed than the little 4 or 5 pt? Thats what I am asking?
original:Phade
This post just may be the most poorly thought out one I've seen in a long time here.
Your theory of "potential" on these young deer is so wrong that it's sad it's being propagated.
The LARGESTfactor of the deer that you deemed to have less potential were victims of a late birth date, and vice versa for the larger racked 1.5's. Science has proven time and time again that they not only catch up, but in many cases become studs. Even though you noted science behind this, it doesn't make it any better to assume that the larger potential deer will be bigger, and thus bank your harvest decisions on that. If you shoot are younger deer, regardless of antler size, you are still shooting a younger deer - bottom line. At that point, it doesn't matter because YOU don't know what they COULD become. A 1.5 is a 1.5....is a 1.5.
This post just may be the most poorly thought out one I've seen in a long time here.
Your theory of "potential" on these young deer is so wrong that it's sad it's being propagated.
The LARGESTfactor of the deer that you deemed to have less potential were victims of a late birth date, and vice versa for the larger racked 1.5's. Science has proven time and time again that they not only catch up, but in many cases become studs. Even though you noted science behind this, it doesn't make it any better to assume that the larger potential deer will be bigger, and thus bank your harvest decisions on that. If you shoot are younger deer, regardless of antler size, you are still shooting a younger deer - bottom line. At that point, it doesn't matter because YOU don't know what they COULD become. A 1.5 is a 1.5....is a 1.5.
Take 100 first grade boys on the first day of school. A few could actually still only be 5. Some will already be 7. Most will be 6. So there is probably a 18 month age window which percentage wise at that time in their life is pretty big.
But given that, I'll bet you that if you take th 10 tallest boys and the 10 shortest boys and then re-evaluate the same group of boys when they are 18, that there will about a 80% of the tall boys are still the tallest and the other 20% are average and not all the way down into the shortest 10%.
Same with the short boys.
Remember, the premise of the thread is "If you must shoot a young deer.....then which one."
#44
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
ORIGINAL: buttonbuckmaster
I find it funny that someone 2 counties or 5 states away cares what I shoot.
I find it funny that someone 2 counties or 5 states away cares what I shoot.
You can't possibly know what is going on at someone else's property to try to dictate what they should or should not shoot. QDM is a good thing, but people need to realize that it is not realistic or even possible everywhere you go.
#45
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
I find it funny that someone 2 counties or 5 states away cares what I shoot.
If that does not encompass your area, then I am not talking to you and you are right.....I don't care.
#46
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
I will put it simply some guys in the hunting world are the slime of the earth and would kill a fawn if they were permitted. Ive seen guys shoot fawns just because they wanna kill something. And i say hunters who kills spikes should be shot themselves. Its not right to kill such a small deer. Id rather just kill a doe.
#47
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
I will put it simply some guys in the hunting world are the slime of the earth and would kill a fawn if they were permitted. Ive seen guys shoot fawns just because they wanna kill something. And i say hunters who kills spikes should be shot themselves. Its not right to kill such a small deer.
Same question goes for guys who've shot spikes, here. Slime?
#49
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
ORIGINAL: jackflap
I find it funny that someone would kill a 2.5 yo instead of a 1.5 yo when both are plentiful and the area has the potential to grow big deer.
If that does not encompass your area, then I am not talking to you and you are right.....I don't care.
I find it funny that someone 2 counties or 5 states away cares what I shoot.
If that does not encompass your area, then I am not talking to you and you are right.....I don't care.
It's real easy to put your perspectives on somebody else's situation, but 9 times out of 10 it's also a mistake. There is property right across the river from me where those 2.5 year oldsyou have pictured are some of the oldest in those woods. The property is huntedvery intensely and anything making the 3 point to a side minimum gets shot. So, if you see one of those bucks in that pictureon that pieceyou'd better be shooting because that is one of thebest bucks there.
#50
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,913
RE: If you just have to shoot a young buck.....
ORIGINAL: jackflap
I find it funny that someone would kill a 2.5 yo instead of a 1.5 yo when both are plentiful and the area has the potential to grow big deer.
If that does not encompass your area, then I am not talking to you and you are right.....I don't care.
I find it funny that someone 2 counties or 5 states away cares what I shoot.
If that does not encompass your area, then I am not talking to you and you are right.....I don't care.