![]() |
RE: stupidest regs
wow some pretty friged up regs
|
RE: stupidest regs
[quote]ORIGINAL: bigtim6656
i fell good about indiana now. Not sure which one is the worst here. i would say the fact you must by a license for each derr you buy 25 each for your normale license and 25 for the first bonus anterless and 15 for the rest. But we can kill 7 deer in my county and the next county i can get 8 more and if i went county to county i could kill more then 300 does [quote] I don't have to buy a license for each. in fact I never will have to buy one in Indiana again. Liftime license sure is nice. |
RE: stupidest regs
Man I love Missouri!
The only one I can think of right now is the antler restrictions. I really don't like those. |
RE: stupidest regs
ORIGINAL: robbcayman ORIGINAL: minnesotadeer We are only allowed one deer per year now too in pretty much the southern half of the state because they claim numbers are down substantially. It was just in the paper this past weekend that statwide, about 62,000 some archery hunters took about 24,000 deer, giving bowhunters a success rate of just over 24 percent. Compare that to gun hunters who took 216,000 plus deer with a 37 percent success rate. Instead of complaining about it, I actually approached the Big Game director via e-mail, asking if they'd consider allowing bowhunters a buck and doe tag, so they could still only take one doe for population management purposes. I used the reasoning of the lower success rate and that the influx of new bowhunters due to this change would be minimal - and that the DNR always has the freedom to change it back if they feel it causes problems. He said they'd consider it. I can see your point, but at $10 a pop times maybe another 10,000-15,000 deer or so, if that high,I'm thinking they don't consider the extra tag revenue enough of a factor. I'm waiting to see the new population density maps come out on the DNR web site and to see in a year or two if the one deer limit and limited doe gun tags has made a difference and will eventually allow us two again. At least they're trying to keep a good population (it's usually well over a million estimated deer to 500,000 hunters who harvest about 200,000 of them), I guess versus some states that try to eradicate it. The other thing to consider is that there are many more gun hunters in our state, about 9 times as many,as there are bowhunters. Getting an extra permit because of weapon choice wouldn't likely sit well with them. |
RE: stupidest regs
In MA, No Hunting on Sunday.[:@]
|
RE: stupidest regs
well the only one i cant understand is in missouri you can only take one buck before rifle season and then your next after rifle season. or take both after rifle season. its like they are scared we are gonna shoot all the bucks so the gun hunters wont have any to hunt.....whatever. i still have unlimited does in my county.
|
RE: stupidest regs
In Pennsylvania, it is illegal to wear pants while hunting.
|
RE: stupidest regs
ORIGINAL: quiksilver In Pennsylvania, it is illegal to wear pants while hunting. |
RE: stupidest regs
Step aside people................... for I live in Massachusetts-
land of the idiot, liberal, do-nothing, give-away-everything wombats! This one beats everything I've read so far (and I've read them all) When you purchase your deer hunting license here in MA, you automatically get two (2) buck tags & zero (0) doe tags. In order to legally take a doe in MA, one must apply first for an antlerless permit for a specific zone (of which, there are 14). If picked, you are only allowed to take ONE (1) doe in that specific zone- no other! If you're not picked, tough luck- you can try to apply for anantlerless permit in a zone that still has remaining doe tags available. This- in a state that has about an 8;1 doe to buck ratio (and that's a conservative estimate). What do you think of that doozy!! Rob |
RE: stupidest regs
This- in a state that has about an 8;1 doe to buck ratio (and that's a conservative estimate). |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.