And neither does anyone else, but the moment they are on my property and I have a tag, then I should be able to make the decision.

why need a tag, VS ... your logic is flawed .. you should be able to shoot what you want, when you want, and how many you want ..... right?

Actually the state does[&:]

PT, you seem to have all the answers today.Thanks for the poor spelling correction. That doesn't happen often.

EI........nah...lol....

Ya know....EI....you're not entirely wrong on this.

If that man (the son) married and bore children with a woman of "upper" intelligence capacity.........and their kids did similarly.........then I can see how this could relate to the topic at hand.

Problem is......the buck ain't "real particular" about who he "marries". In an uncontrolled environemnt.....where he could (and will) mate with "any" receptive doe. So.....it's not logical to expect that great of things from them.

BUT....if you COULD control who's he's mating with.....and manage it, strictly.........

.....I believe a deer could be president by the year 2,274.

that's true, but i was dealing with the logic behind the statement ... but Gary is right ... the state that makes the game laws owns them .... like it or not

"why need a tag, VS ... your logic is flawed .. you should be able to shoot what you want, when you want, and how many you want ..... right? "

No, your attempts to instigate are flawed because you are piecemealing my arguments together in a non-linear fashion. I never once said anything in the quote above. I said I could see having bag limits, and by saying I had a tag I am inferring that I am willing to consent to the governments authority over how many bucks/does I can kill. I just do not agree with AR restrictions. Try again.

early, I thought I told you to stay out! ....just playin' ...am I wrong, though?

I just thought it funny that you spelled college wrong

Sorry.... not trying to instigate anything ...... YOU are the one that seperated public land restriction from private ownership ...... I just adressed you logic in that ........ VS .... you bees one of my faves ....

Brett:

You say you'd be willing to consent to the (state) government's authority re: bag limts, right?

Then why not AR's?

If you just disagree with them....I understand (me too). But I'm trying to tie this back into the private land argument.