The way the indians did it - Bowhunting
#61
I thought you were leaving until July[:-]
#62
Now go 1 step further and remove the word Bow....is an animal at 20 yards any less a trophy with Gun?? We can all hit the "spot" 10 out of 10 times ..that was a given. Does the projectile make the difference?
I've made my own ice fishing poles and lures etc. and the fish I caught on them were special, so I can understand what I think the OP is saying.
#63
If a guy can hit his mark, 10 out of 10 at 20 yards regardless of weapon, it's not harder one way or another, it's about getting the animal at that 20 yards, not hitting him.
But, if you think about what it tookto get to that point using what was available at the time........
#64
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
Likes: 0
But that's bow shooting, NOT bowhunting.
Your shooting skill can make up for a deficiency in hunting skill just like your hunting skill can make up for a deficiency in shooting skill. It's a lot easier, with a compound with sights, fast bows and mechanical releases to work up the shooting skill than it is to develop the hunting skill. There are a scant handful of traditional or primitive bowhunters that have the shooting ability that would even let themdream of taking a shot beyond 30 yards, and most won't even attempt a shot beyond 20.
All the time you see where people who claimone mustshoot 40-50, even 60 or 70 yards in order to be successful on western game. And yet you can pick up a traditional bowhuntingmagazine and see guys who have taken the exact samespecies on the exact same ground with a homemade selfbow and wood arrows from 15 yards and less.
Both are bowhunting, but the methods and techniques are very, very different.
#68
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
Besides shouldn't this be moved to the traditional board ??
Besides shouldn't this be moved to the traditional board ??

[8D]
#69
But that's bow shooting, NOT bowhunting.
Even if the shot is at 10 yards and you are equally accurate with both weapons, the traditional equipment poses bigger obstacles as compared to a compound.
When bow shooting, I can control when I draw back and when I release. When bowhunting, these things are usually dictated by the circumstances of the hunt rather than my comfort zone, that is if I want to increase mysucess rate.
So a 10 yard shot with an 80% let off compound that I drew back and held for 60 seconds or longer while he was behind a bush before stepping out into a shooting lane is much different than the guy with traditional equipment who does not have the same luxury, is it not?
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
ORIGINAL: jackflap
I do not agree.
Even if the shot is at 10 yards and you are equally accurate with both weapons, the traditional equipment poses bigger obstacles as compared to a compound.
When bow shooting, I can control when I draw back and when I release. When bowhunting, these things are usually dictated by the circumstances of the hunt rather than my comfort zone, that is if I want to increase mysucess rate.
So a 10 yard shot with an 80% let off compound that I drew back and held for 60 seconds or longer while he was behind a bush before stepping out into a shooting lane is much different than the guy with traditional equipment who does not have the same luxury, is it not?
But that's bow shooting, NOT bowhunting.
Even if the shot is at 10 yards and you are equally accurate with both weapons, the traditional equipment poses bigger obstacles as compared to a compound.
When bow shooting, I can control when I draw back and when I release. When bowhunting, these things are usually dictated by the circumstances of the hunt rather than my comfort zone, that is if I want to increase mysucess rate.
So a 10 yard shot with an 80% let off compound that I drew back and held for 60 seconds or longer while he was behind a bush before stepping out into a shooting lane is much different than the guy with traditional equipment who does not have the same luxury, is it not?



