![]() |
RE: Minnesota Hunters Sue Scent Lok
I agree with Larry.... "Im gonna sue Hustler magazine for giving my wrist Carpal Tunnel"
|
RE: Minnesota Hunters Sue Scent Lok
ORIGINAL: LebeauHunter statjunk, My "religious diatribe" is very relevant. It is simply an example to highlight the highly litigious nature of our society. Why should all the answers be found in courts? You mean to tell me that 40 years ago people would sued over hunting clothes? Oh, let me guess, you would naively believe there was no creative/deceptive marketing back then. I am not the one who thinks a sucker is born every minute, you are the one with the condescending attitude who thinks that the "poor little consumer" is just helpless and stupid and can't make up his own mind about how to spend his money. Why are you so worried about what other people do with their money? I'm done arguing with people who can so passionately argue about a frivolous suit. The fact that so many people have thrown the residual value of scentlok over common cammo clothing in the trash doesn't keep me up at night. But when a kid comes on here and says should I take my money and buy some scentlok instead of a <insert more necessary hunting accessory here> because the commercial says I can kill deer without it; Knowing that person has to do low paying crappy chores or work to get there. It bums me out a bit. Nothing will come of the lawsuit. It will be settled or thrown out. So GMMAT you won't be able to jump ship. There will likely be no quantifiable outcome. Tom |
RE: Minnesota Hunters Sue Scent Lok
Nothing will come of the lawsuit. It will be settled or thrown out. So GMMAT you won't be able to jump ship. There will likely be no quantifiable outcome. |
RE: Minnesota Hunters Sue Scent Lok
because the commercial says I can kill deer without it; |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.