Scentlok mailed final rejection.
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Scentlok mailed final rejection.
On Sept.13, 2007 the US patent Office mailed a final rejection letter to Scentlok concerning their patent. Details will be posted as available. Its about time ? In the Feb. issue of Field and Stream in 1999, a wise Dr., Una Lynch was quoeted as saying that the carbon concept can't work as claimed, its not scientifically possible. Here we are 8 years,6 months later having the US Patent office making the same determination. What affect do you feel this will have on carbon clothing ?
#2
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
I'm not a Scent Lok owner. Never tried the stuff, but have always felt it was just another hunting product made to get hunters to part with their money with little to no return on investment. To me, if you stay clean and do your best to hunt with the wind in your face, the deer won't know you are there.
[/align]
[/align]Besides...Doesn't the ScentLok clothing itself give off a weird odor?
[/align]
[/align]
[/align]Besides...Doesn't the ScentLok clothing itself give off a weird odor?
[/align]
#3
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blossvale, New York
Posts: 21,199
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
I've always maintained it can't work anywhere near as good as advertised. I worked to much with activated carbon in my real life to fall for it. And all this talk from the other manufacturer stating it's been proven effective against replicated human odor is a farce also. Maybe now we'll get back to being able to buy clothes without having to pay for this snake oil. Like last night in Gander Mountain, I found a perfect fitting pair of gloves I wanted... nothing special. I tried them on, the fit great and did what I wanted. I flipped up the price tag. $49!!!!! Then I saw why, Scent Blocker. I hung them back on the rack and left without them. I refuse to pay for snake oil gloves. They'd probably be $19 if they didn't have Scent Blocker on them. Same deal in the boot rack. Why do we have to pay $50-100 more for a pair of boots because they have a Scent Blocker tag on them.
#4
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
I'm with you David, I've been out looking for new boots. EVERYTHING at Dick's and Gander has some sort of scent lok thatI don't want,and I certainly do not want to pay for it.
#5
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
Though I don't use carbon clothing I don't quite understand this. There are literally thousands of consumer products on the market that have been issued patents that do not work as advertised.
Next big scam on the hunting market...............most scent killing sprays.
Next big scam on the hunting market...............most scent killing sprays.
#6
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
ORIGINAL: Cougar Mag
Next big scam on the hunting market...............most scent killing sprays.
Next big scam on the hunting market...............most scent killing sprays.
Ex: I sprayed it on my hands to remove gas smells after working on equipment.
#7
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
I'm working on a fart enhancing product that willturn your gas into a most effective deer lure. The key is in my secret chile recipe that will be bundled with the fart pill. The ingredients in both the chile and the fart pill if consumed 12 hours before the hunt interact with each other to produce the gas of choice. I'm also marketing a new line of clothing to get that gas out in the open quickly. Yep...a hole in the bum area.
#8
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
Rob, I use a spray or two myself........but there are so many new brands coming out each year each touting their abilities to kill or limit human odor.
Best thing for keeping odor to a minimum is keeping as clean as possible and don't eat red meat during hunting season.....admittedly thats something I don't do.[8D]
Best thing for keeping odor to a minimum is keeping as clean as possible and don't eat red meat during hunting season.....admittedly thats something I don't do.[8D]
#9
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
ORIGINAL: brono
On Sept.13, 2007 the US patent Office mailed a final rejection letter to Scentlok concerning their patent. Details will be posted as available. Its about time ? In the Feb. issue of Field and Stream in 1999, a wise Dr., Una Lynch was quoeted as saying that the carbon concept can't work as claimed, its not scientifically possible. Here we are 8 years,6 months later having the US Patent office making the same determination. What affect do you feel this will have on carbon clothing ?
On Sept.13, 2007 the US patent Office mailed a final rejection letter to Scentlok concerning their patent. Details will be posted as available. Its about time ? In the Feb. issue of Field and Stream in 1999, a wise Dr., Una Lynch was quoeted as saying that the carbon concept can't work as claimed, its not scientifically possible. Here we are 8 years,6 months later having the US Patent office making the same determination. What affect do you feel this will have on carbon clothing ?
Source?
Where did you get this information?
Though I dont believe in the effectiveness of activated carbon clothing to be "Regenerated" as most companies claim I do believe accuracy in reporting so called facts.
#10
Typical Buck
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 957
RE: Scentlok mailed final rejection.
Don't eat red meat? Are you CRAZY??????
Our deer season is from AUG. 15th to JAN. 1st!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No red meat during the WHOLE hunting season????
You've gotta invest in some kind of wind indicator.
Our deer season is from AUG. 15th to JAN. 1st!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No red meat during the WHOLE hunting season????
You've gotta invest in some kind of wind indicator.