For those of you who keep a journal...??
#1
For those of you who keep a journal.....how do you document buck sightings....as it relates to fawns? To be honest.....if it has spots....I'm not checking it out real close (although I have....to see if I can discern their sex).
In last year's bow journal.....I didn't count the animal as a buck unless it had visible protrusions....or a rack. For the sake of documenting the herd dynamics for our wildlife biologist, though.....I think it's only fair that we consider 50% of all fawns as buck fawns.
I'm not trying to pad the buck numbers in my area....I'm trying to project a realistic number....so as to more accurately discuss herd dynamics with the man that's giving me management information.
I'll check with him today.....but I was just wondering what you guys do.
Thanks, in advance, for your response(s).
In last year's bow journal.....I didn't count the animal as a buck unless it had visible protrusions....or a rack. For the sake of documenting the herd dynamics for our wildlife biologist, though.....I think it's only fair that we consider 50% of all fawns as buck fawns.
I'm not trying to pad the buck numbers in my area....I'm trying to project a realistic number....so as to more accurately discuss herd dynamics with the man that's giving me management information.
I'll check with him today.....but I was just wondering what you guys do.
Thanks, in advance, for your response(s).
#2
I document everything. I keep track of does, bucks, and fawns. To be considered a doe or a buck, it must be 1.5 years old regardless of headgear..........otherwise it falls into the fawn category. When counting fawns, I don't bother to record if they are button bucks or does.
#3
Unless it hasa visible rack I consider it a female deer. I count button bucks as bucks, but the majority of younger deer that I see are does anyways, especially because the buck to do ratio is so outta whack in my area.
#4
Matt:
How would you ever keep tabs on your buck:doe ratio, then?
Do you just discount all fawns and use the data you have on the 1.5 yr olds+? I can see this working "kind of". BUT.....you have to admit that the bucks are going to take a beating by hunters moreso than the does. If you're only counting yearling bucks/does.....YOUR ratio is going to reflect a much greater differential than what is the "true" ratio. Does that make sense?
How would you ever keep tabs on your buck:doe ratio, then?
Do you just discount all fawns and use the data you have on the 1.5 yr olds+? I can see this working "kind of". BUT.....you have to admit that the bucks are going to take a beating by hunters moreso than the does. If you're only counting yearling bucks/does.....YOUR ratio is going to reflect a much greater differential than what is the "true" ratio. Does that make sense?
#5
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
How would you ever keep tabs on your buck:doe ratio, then?
Do you just discount all fawns and use the data you have on the 1.5 yr olds+?
How would you ever keep tabs on your buck:doe ratio, then?
Do you just discount all fawns and use the data you have on the 1.5 yr olds+?
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
BUT.....you have to admit that the bucks are going to take a beating by hunters moreso than the does. If you're only counting yearling bucks/does.....YOUR ratio is going to reflect a much greater differential than what is the "true" ratio. Does that make sense?
BUT.....you have to admit that the bucks are going to take a beating by hunters moreso than the does. If you're only counting yearling bucks/does.....YOUR ratio is going to reflect a much greater differential than what is the "true" ratio. Does that make sense?
I'd like to kill maybe one buck off the place (if we are lucky) this year and 4-5 does.
#9
ORIGINAL: Greg / MO
Matt, sounds like you need some help shooting does!! My number is 573....
Matt, sounds like you need some help shooting does!! My number is 573....




