Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
02-15-2007, 02:42 PM
#21
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,288
RE: Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
Hay fellas, I have loged Several Thousand Hours on the Internet in the last couple Elections on Politics and just came back in Oct to this Bowhunting Forum to get away from it. So do me a favor and keep the Liberal, Conservative CRAP over on the Politacal Forum where it Belongs!
02-15-2007, 02:51 PM
#22
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 11
RE: Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
Well I personally don't like Howard Stern, but after reading the original post of this thread I thought
I would try to see if I could find it. For those still interested I have the Ted segment so just shoot me
a PM and I'll see what I can do.
I would try to see if I could find it. For those still interested I have the Ted segment so just shoot me
a PM and I'll see what I can do.
02-15-2007, 03:41 PM
#24
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,203
RE: Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
I have to admit, Ted does have the gift of gab. True, he may not format his delivery in an ideal fashion, but that man can hang with anybody in a debate purely based on his speaking skills.
02-19-2007, 06:18 PM
#26
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 484
RE: Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
ORIGINAL: Maggy
I sure hope Teds kid he had out of wedlock is doing ok.
I sure hope Teds kid he had out of wedlock is doing ok.
02-20-2007, 11:18 AM
#28
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Stafford Virginia Stafford,Va
Posts: 593
RE: Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
How many board members does it take to SLAM TED ???
One to ask a question and include Ted in the post.
Fourteen to share similar experiences of Ted, and how the Ted could have done things or acteddifferently.
Seven to caution about the dangers of slandering Ted.
Seven more to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about what Ted did.
Five to flame the spell checkers.
Three to correct spelling/grammar flames.
Six to argue over whether it's "Ted " or "The Nuge" ...
Another six to condemn those six as stupid.
Fifteen to claim experience in the hunting and speaking industry and give the correct spelling.
Nineteen to post that thispost is not about Ted and to please take
this discussion to apolitical,general or off seasonforum.
Eleven to defend the posting to the group saying that we all as hunters must stick together, and therefore the posts are relevant to this group.
Thirty six to debate which method of representing hunters is superior, where to say what , what representation works best for thisgroup and what does the most damage.
Seven to post URLs where one can see examples of different representors.
Four to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and then post the
corrected URL.
Three to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to thispost, which makes Ted relevant or not to this post.
Thirteen to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including
all headers and signatures, and then just repond with "Me too".
Five to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the NUGENT controversy.
Four to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
Thirteen to say "do a Google search on Nugent before postinglies or truths about Ted"
Three to tell a funny story about theirexperiences "with" and aboutTed.
One group lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
Cant take credit for that it was taken from another poster and modified
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: Maggy
I sure hope Teds kid he had out of wedlock is doing ok.
[/blockquote]
You have some kind of personal issue with the man , that is quite obvious in your posts. Why do you feel the need to cast stone after stone? Perhaps you were a spurned groupie at one time?
Really Maggy, I was starting to get that same impression, Out of 40 posts you have made since joining in Jan 07. All but 3 pertain to Ted.
There really must be somereal issue, I canlive with or with out Ted, I would not focus most of my posts or time on him either way.
One to ask a question and include Ted in the post.
Fourteen to share similar experiences of Ted, and how the Ted could have done things or acteddifferently.
Seven to caution about the dangers of slandering Ted.
Seven more to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about what Ted did.
Five to flame the spell checkers.
Three to correct spelling/grammar flames.
Six to argue over whether it's "Ted " or "The Nuge" ...
Another six to condemn those six as stupid.
Fifteen to claim experience in the hunting and speaking industry and give the correct spelling.
Nineteen to post that thispost is not about Ted and to please take
this discussion to apolitical,general or off seasonforum.
Eleven to defend the posting to the group saying that we all as hunters must stick together, and therefore the posts are relevant to this group.
Thirty six to debate which method of representing hunters is superior, where to say what , what representation works best for thisgroup and what does the most damage.
Seven to post URLs where one can see examples of different representors.
Four to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and then post the
corrected URL.
Three to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to thispost, which makes Ted relevant or not to this post.
Thirteen to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including
all headers and signatures, and then just repond with "Me too".
Five to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the NUGENT controversy.
Four to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
Thirteen to say "do a Google search on Nugent before postinglies or truths about Ted"
Three to tell a funny story about theirexperiences "with" and aboutTed.
One group lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
Cant take credit for that it was taken from another poster and modified
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: Maggy
I sure hope Teds kid he had out of wedlock is doing ok.
[/blockquote]
You have some kind of personal issue with the man , that is quite obvious in your posts. Why do you feel the need to cast stone after stone? Perhaps you were a spurned groupie at one time?
Really Maggy, I was starting to get that same impression, Out of 40 posts you have made since joining in Jan 07. All but 3 pertain to Ted.
There really must be somereal issue, I canlive with or with out Ted, I would not focus most of my posts or time on him either way.
02-20-2007, 02:30 PM
#29
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 53
RE: Ted Nugent on Howard Stern today
Glad you did your research on me Ben.
I do not care one way or the other what people think about me.
I have to live in the same state and listen to the biggest blabbermouthed shine Teds nutsack sycophant that ever lived.
If there is ANYONE that posts anything positive about Ted, then there is equal time and space for the truth and public knowledge about Ted. Fair and simple as that.
That is all.
I do not care one way or the other what people think about me.
I have to live in the same state and listen to the biggest blabbermouthed shine Teds nutsack sycophant that ever lived.
If there is ANYONE that posts anything positive about Ted, then there is equal time and space for the truth and public knowledge about Ted. Fair and simple as that.
That is all.
