How many board members does it take to SLAM TED ???
One to ask a question and include Ted in the post.
Fourteen to share similar experiences of Ted, and how the Ted could have done things or acteddifferently.
Seven to caution about the dangers of slandering Ted.
Seven more to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about what Ted did.
Five to flame the spell checkers.
Three to correct spelling/grammar flames.
Six to argue over whether it's "Ted " or "The Nuge" ...
Another six to condemn those six as stupid.
Fifteen to claim experience in the hunting and speaking industry and give the correct spelling.
Nineteen to post that thispost is not about Ted and to please take
this discussion to apolitical,general or off seasonforum.
Eleven to defend the posting to the group saying that we all as hunters must stick together, and therefore the posts are relevant to this group.
Thirty six to debate which method of representing hunters is superior, where to say what , what representation works best for thisgroup and what does the most damage.
Seven to post URLs where one can see examples of different representors.
Four to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and then post the
corrected URL.
Three to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to thispost, which makes Ted relevant or not to this post.
Thirteen to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including
all headers and signatures, and then just repond with "Me too".
Five to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the NUGENT controversy.
Four to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
Thirteen to say "do a Google search on Nugent before postinglies or truths about Ted"
Three to tell a funny story about theirexperiences "with" and aboutTed.
One group lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
Cant take credit for that it was taken from another poster and modified
[blockquote]
quote:
ORIGINAL: Maggy
I sure hope Teds kid he had out of wedlock is doing ok.
[/blockquote]
You have some kind of personal issue with the man , that is quite obvious in your posts. Why do you feel the need to cast stone after stone? Perhaps you were a spurned groupie at one time?
Really Maggy, I was starting to get that same impression, Out of 40 posts you have made since joining in Jan 07. All but 3 pertain to Ted.
There really must be somereal issue, I canlive with or with out Ted, I would not focus most of my posts or time on him either way.