These bucks are really different. One of them has more mass and forked tines and the other has really tall, symmetrical antlers. If antler size and score didn't matter, which one would you like more on your wall??

PERSONALLY I'LL TAKE THE SECOND, BUT IN MY PERSONAL OPINION I LIKE THE MOST NON TYPICAL.

Neither, both those bucks are young as heck. The top buck is probably 2 1/2 and the bottom one is probably 4 1/2. Those bucks have great potential and arent nearly mature yet. I'd give the top deer atleast another 3 years and the bottom one atleast another year. Those deer would be off limits to everybody who hunts out here......

I would take either. They are both great bucks and anyone would be lucky to take either one of them.

Only in Texas, is a 4.5 year old buck young as heck

...and I've never met anyone who can accurately age a deer by looking at his head only. Keyword is accurately.

It was more a question of which rack you thought looked better, and actually, the buck on the top is a lot older than you may think. You can't hunt them out here anyway.

Sorry guys trying to check out something my pappy in law taught me.

442deer I agree with you 100% 4 1\2 year old deer young???? The only place that a 4 1|2 year old deer needs more time to grow must be Texas. In iowa 4 1\2 year old deer is a true trophy. Stillhunt04 I think they are both nice bucks. I would choose the second buck, but only if he got to me first.LOL TXhighrack. If these are so small, post up some picks of the Texas Trophys you have bagged!?!?

second