Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

777 pellet equivalence

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-21-2004 | 09:04 AM
  #1  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 777 pellet equivalence

From my understanding 777 pellets are not just 50gr of 777 loose pelletized? Right? 3 777 50gr pellets are supposed to build the same pressure as 3 pyrodex pellets? Is this correct? So is 3-777 pellets the same as 130gr of loose 777 ffg? Has anyone tried comparing velocities?

Thanks for all who respond.

Also, does anyone think that 777 is much less corrosive than pyrodex or Goex? Is is alot more corrosive than smokeless?
 
Reply
Old 09-21-2004 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
Default RE: 777 pellet equivalence

T7 pellets are supposed to be equivalent to Pyrodex pellets.

Loose T7 is supposed to be more potent than loose pyrodex or pellets, by about 15% or so. This is all heresay, I've never used T7.

Your math looks right to me.
UncleNorby is offline  
Reply
Old 09-21-2004 | 11:53 AM
  #3  
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Wabash, IN
Default RE: 777 pellet equivalence

You are correct on your understanding of the 777 pellets. They are formulated to shoot like regular Pyro pellets, so they ARE weaker than an equivalent measure of loose 777. If I had to give a "seat of the pants" estimate of an equivalent charge - I'd say the 3 777 pellets are probably about the same as 120gr of loose 777.....................and really, 120gr of loose 777 is probably a max load anyway - going above that is probably not gonna help your shooting any and COULD be dangerous over time IMHO.

I really haven't tried my luck with 777's corrosiveness - but seeing how easy it cleans up, I would have to guess that it is probably less corrosive than Pyro and MUCH less so than Black. But regardless of powder, Muzzleloaders need to be cleaned aggressively or there will be problems - they can't be treated like smokeless firearms..................not if you want to keep them serviceable for years to come.
Mark whiz is offline  
Reply
Old 09-21-2004 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
sabotloader's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,703
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default RE: 777 pellet equivalence

bigcountry,

You are right on - on my powder scales - 3 pellets of 50 grain t7 on the average weighs out to 121.6 grains of loose.

I really think that t7 is cleaner than either pyro or BP, either pryro or t7 is less corrosive than BP. But I don't kow that I can say t7 is less corrosive than pyro - but definitely cleaner and over a chrono seems to have less load variations in velocity.
sabotloader is offline  
Reply
Old 09-21-2004 | 12:46 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Default RE: 777 pellet equivalence

You probably have been reading some of my threads/posts on 777 pellets lately Big Country. On a high side, you may see an indiviual 50-grain 777 pellet equal to 42 grains 777 loose... on a light side 40 grains because packaged pellets come inconsistent from the Hodgdon factory.

On a another discussion in this thread, Pyrodex is more corrosive than real blackpowder & is also more hygroscopic than blackpowder or even 777.
Triple Se7en is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blwalt17
Guns
14
07-27-2005 11:54 PM
Squirrelhunter91
Guns
29
02-08-2005 06:27 PM
buckmastr229
Small Game, Predator and Trapping
10
11-02-2004 11:32 PM
MarineStud
Small Game, Predator and Trapping
10
10-23-2004 01:14 PM
buckmastr229
Guns
2
02-23-2004 05:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.