Buying new ML - Which one?
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central Illinois USA
Posts: 66
Buying new ML - Which one?
I'm brand new to ML. I've strictly bowhunted for about the last 10 years and just realized I'm missing out on a lot of great hunting opportunities by not taking advantage of the ML seasons.
I'm in the market for a new ML (my first). I really like the break open designs. I've looked at the CVA Optima Pro and the TC Encore. Is there a significant difference between these two ML's to justify the difference in price? It looks like the CVA can be bought for around $280. I guess for the money I'm leaning towards the CVA. Is this a mistake? Also, I've heard that Knight is coming out with a new break open design. Has anyone heard anything about this?
Is there another one I should be considering as well?
Thanks in advance!
I'm in the market for a new ML (my first). I really like the break open designs. I've looked at the CVA Optima Pro and the TC Encore. Is there a significant difference between these two ML's to justify the difference in price? It looks like the CVA can be bought for around $280. I guess for the money I'm leaning towards the CVA. Is this a mistake? Also, I've heard that Knight is coming out with a new break open design. Has anyone heard anything about this?
Is there another one I should be considering as well?
Thanks in advance!
#2
RE: Buying new ML - Which one?
i have a T/C hawkens .50 flintlock....and love it....we have a late season flintlock in pa after x-mas....so you have to use a flintlock....i use it in buck season going on now...............bob
#4
RE: Buying new ML - Which one?
I bought a T/C Omega .50 cal. and I really like it a lot. I hunted with a Renegade for a long time, and the traditional look of the Renegade and the Hawken is really cool. However, for ease of use, reliability, care and clean-up, the new break action in-lines can't be beat. I went with T/C because of the company's outstanding reputation. It was expensive at $359.00, and I could not afford to buy a scope with the gun, but that will come with time. The gun is very light weight and accurate.
So, the Omega would be a good choice if you don't mind spending the $$$. Other inlines are good too, of course, but in my opinion, it is a good service to our country and our economy to buy an American product like T/C, or Knight. But that is just my 2 cents.
So, the Omega would be a good choice if you don't mind spending the $$$. Other inlines are good too, of course, but in my opinion, it is a good service to our country and our economy to buy an American product like T/C, or Knight. But that is just my 2 cents.
#6
Spike
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: oakwood virginia USA
Posts: 91
RE: Buying new ML - Which one?
Go to Wal Mart and get one of the green stocked Hunterbolt mag's for 149 dollars. I get 1.5 inch groups out of mine at 90 yards and I killed a deer the other day at 151 yards(rangefinder) holding dead on with it zeroed 2.5 inches high at 50 yards. Best value on the market
#7
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rochester MN USA
Posts: 96
RE: Buying new ML - Which one?
my CVA pissed me off the first day of the season. I put it in the case, and when I pulled it out the piece of junk front sight was busted. it is a plastic base holding the fiber optic sight. I had enough of it left that I sighted it back in using the top of what was left of the post. I found a replacement (front and rear set) for $20, but it was the same piece of junk. I talked to a gun shop, and he said all the CVA sights were plastic like that, AND CVA has a different thread size than everyone else, so he would have to redrill and tap the barrel to put a new TC steel sight on. That is going to cost me $20 for the sight, and $17 labor to redrill.
If I was to buy another CVA, I would plan on paying the cost of a replacement sight in the beginning so you don't have to sight the thing in again and again.
If I was to buy another CVA, I would plan on paying the cost of a replacement sight in the beginning so you don't have to sight the thing in again and again.