![]() |
Originally Posted by Grouse45
(Post 4233332)
Then after I get the gun shooting accurately, I'm going to give it away on this forum to someone who needs a conical shooter. Your Buddy Muley is the first that comes to mind.
|
Originally Posted by flounder33
(Post 4233331)
I sold them all to buy rifles I wanted. Maybe you remember the last time I sent you something to test along with promised payment you never did your part of the bargain.
|
Originally Posted by MountainDevil54
(Post 4233333)
good way buy friendship lol
|
Originally Posted by Grouse45
(Post 4233336)
No, I truly believe he doesn't have much money to buy extra guns. Plus I sent him a gun one time and he sent it back. Pretty stand up guy when it comes to stuff like that but maybe im Nieve.
|
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 4233338)
No, you're not nieve. I appreciated the gun you sent me, but I tried to buy it from you more than once, and you wouldn't sell it to me. I felt too funny to just keep it, so I sent it back. I actually liked that gun a lot, and I didn't want to give it back.
But you still drive me crazy sometimes lol:s4: |
As do you for me, but that's why it's so fun. :p
|
Originally Posted by Grouse45
(Post 4233336)
No, I truly believe he doesn't have much money to buy extra guns. Plus I sent him a gun one time and he sent it back. Pretty stand up guy when it comes to stuff like that but maybe im Nieve.
Let me also say having money for extra guns is out of the question. I have a hard enough time coming up with the money for just one gun. I don't have any at the moment. __________________ |
I'll repeat it... I think the Accura MR in SS/black is probably the best rifle on the market for the money. I would now go beyond that and state that I would prefer it to anything TC or Knight has to offer.
|
Originally Posted by Underclocked
(Post 4233373)
I'll repeat it... I think the Accura MR in SS/black is probably the best rifle on the market for the money. I would now go beyond that and state that I would prefer it to anything TC or Knight has to offer.
|
You sure are an insistent old goat. Just because it carries well whilst hunting, is accurate, is reliable, has a sweet trigger, comes with a sling? What did i leave out?
Oops, not you Muley. |
I accept the old goat part. :p
|
Grouse's claim about being able to work accuracy magic on some of the TC barrels is also complete nonsense, in spite of his overly generous opinion of his own talents. I had such a barrel and there is no way on earth he could have developed a load using conicals that would have been satisfactory to anyone. It was as a washboard throughout the rifled section and QLA was badly misaligned. It was too much to ask that it keep groups inside a wash tub opening at 50 yards.
But Grouse states his "facts" as if he is THE ANSWER... even when he is dead wrong. He cites me as being a positive influence in his learning process. He obviously missed some of the more important lessons. Thanks Ron. ;) Want to see my eye? ![]() |
Wow! Me, i was just kidding; not realizing you really are an old goat.
|
Originally Posted by Underclocked
(Post 4233383)
Grouse's claim about being able to work accuracy magic on some of the TC barrels is also complete nonsense, in spite of his overly generous opinion of his own talents. I had such a barrel and there is no way on earth he could have developed a load using conicals that would have been satisfactory to anyone. It was as a washboard throughout the rifled section and QLA was badly misaligned. It was too much to ask that it keep groups inside a wash tub opening at 50 yards.
But Grouse states his "facts" as if he is THE ANSWER... even when he is dead wrong. He cites me as being a positive influence in his learning process. He obviously missed some of the more important lessons. Thanks Ron. ;) Want to see my eye? ![]() I've owned at least 5 Encores, at least 4 Triumphs, and have shot two Omegas that I don't own with bore size bullets. And all shot pretty darn good at 100 yards with bore size bullets. So what you are saying is im just lucky I guess? Haha, I guess that's possible but unlikely. I take this stuff a little more serious then most. I don't like to joke around or even play games until someone else eggs it on. But its Christmas time and I wanna be nice to someone. You and Flounder33 are coming after me and making some comments that are really not even necessary at all. So im willing to order a new T/C Triumph and shoot bore size bullets out of it. If the Triumph doesn't shoot bore size bullets well out to 100 yards i'll give the muzzleloader to someone on this forum as a gift. But if it does shoot conicals well, you two pay for the ML and I own it. And then im still gonna give the gun away either way. If the Gun does shoot bore size bullets well, ill send the bullet I use and gun to sabotloader to do a test of his own to confirm what I say. All I need is Underclocks word he will pay and ill order one today. |
Originally Posted by Grouse45
(Post 4233401)
And then im still gonna give the gun away either way.
|
If a neutral third party is needed in the selection process if it gets that far
I volunteer and am willing to help. I will step out and not be eligible for anything. On that same token I will not be representing HNI either as I can't nor is it allowed. It will be just my ethics. Dave. JW |
Originally Posted by JW
(Post 4233411)
If a neutral third party is needed in the selection process if it gets that far
I volunteer and am willing to help. I will step out and not be eligible for anything. On that same token I will not be representing HNI either as I can't nor is it allowed. It will be just my ethics. Dave. JW |
I know quite a few others whose opinions I respect have figured it was the qla that prevented many tcs from shooting conicals accurately. Others I respect like Lee have said they have not encountered that problem.
I never cut the qla off my tc guns to see if that would solve the problem but here is a thread by Ron that convinced me it was the off centered qla that caused the inaccuracy. http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/blac...t-casting.html I know of others on another forum that have cut the end of the barrel off with the same result. From these results, second hand as they may be, I have deduced that an off center qla is what caused the problems. A qla that is not centered on the bore but is machined to be centered on the outside of the barrel. I know doc white says that sabots will make up for barrels that are not completely up to his standards, making barrels that are not quite perfect still shoot well. It is entirely possible that a barrel could have a bore that is centered and thus a qla that is centered and then it might shoot conicals with acceptable accuracy. Maybe TC has changed their manufacturing process in their new guns, I have no way of knowing, I only know about the rifles that I and others have owned. It is my opinion that with other barrel manufacturers you would have a sure thing at shooting conicals and with tc it is like playing Russian Roulette, a game I will not play. |
I think the only way to solve this is to find a TC with an off center QLA, and see if an accurate load can be worked up.
|
Originally Posted by flounder33
(Post 4233419)
I know quite a few others whose opinions I respect have figured it was the qla that prevented many tcs from shooting conicals accurately. Others I respect like Lee have said they have not encountered that problem.
I never cut the qla off my tc guns to see if that would solve the problem but here is a thread by Ron that convinced me it was the off centered qla that caused the inaccuracy. http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/blac...t-casting.html I know of others on another forum that have cut the end of the barrel off with the same result. From these results, second hand as they may be, I have deduced that an off center qla is what caused the problems. A qla that is not centered on the bore but is machined to be centered on the outside of the barrel. I know doc white says that sabots will make up for barrels that are not completely up to his standards, making barrels that are not quite perfect still shoot well. It is entirely possible that a barrel could have a bore that is centered and thus a qla that is centered and then it might shoot conicals with acceptable accuracy. Maybe TC has changed their manufacturing process in their new guns, I have no way of knowing, I only know about the rifles that I and others have owned. It is my opinion that with other barrel manufacturers you would have a sure thing at shooting conicals and with tc it is like playing Russian Roulette, a game I will not play. |
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 4233420)
I think the only way to solve this is to find a TC with an off center QLA, and see if an accurate load can be worked up.
|
Originally Posted by Grouse45
(Post 4233429)
If I wasn't confident in what im saying, or know any facts I wouldn't make the comments. And if I thought my answers and results could be all over the place like playing Russian Roulette. I would avoid the answer and not supply any information until I new the facts.
|
Originally Posted by flounder33
(Post 4233436)
One big giant FAIL is all I can say to your response.
|
Originally Posted by flounder33
(Post 4233419)
I know quite a few others whose opinions I respect have figured it was the qla that prevented many tcs from shooting conicals accurately. Others I respect like Lee have said they have not encountered that problem.
I never cut the qla off my tc guns to see if that would solve the problem but here is a thread by Ron that convinced me it was the off centered qla that caused the inaccuracy. http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/blac...t-casting.html I know of others on another forum that have cut the end of the barrel off with the same result. From these results, second hand as they may be, I have deduced that an off center qla is what caused the problems. A qla that is not centered on the bore but is machined to be centered on the outside of the barrel. I know doc white says that sabots will make up for barrels that are not completely up to his standards, making barrels that are not quite perfect still shoot well. It is entirely possible that a barrel could have a bore that is centered and thus a qla that is centered and then it might shoot conicals with acceptable accuracy. Maybe TC has changed their manufacturing process in their new guns, I have no way of knowing, I only know about the rifles that I and others have owned. It is my opinion that with other barrel manufacturers you would have a sure thing at shooting conicals and with tc it is like playing Russian Roulette, a game I will not play. |
Well I was going to say it, grouse some of the stuff you say sure makes you sound arrogant
That said, maybe I am lucky but my tc X7 shoots conical s such as fpb,bull shops and no excuses very accurate .. Seems you got enough money to buy one,why not just do it rather then call out UC and flounder. |
Originally Posted by sbuff
(Post 4233461)
Well I was going to say it, grouse some of the stuff you say sure makes you sound arrogant
That said, maybe I am lucky but my tc X7 shoots conical s such as fpb,bull shops and no excuses very accurate .. Seems you got enough money to buy one,why not just do it rather then call out UC and flounder. |
Originally Posted by MountainDevil54
(Post 4233457)
txhunter58 is another quality member that will also verify the TC QLA problem and I dont think many of us on here would call him a liar like grouse is basically doing on this subject.
|
Originally Posted by Underclocked
(Post 4233373)
I'll repeat it... I think the Accura MR in SS/black is probably the best rifle on the market for the money. I would now go beyond that and state that I would prefer it to anything TC or Knight has to offer.
|
That aint the finished work I would hope?
|
Sabotloader,
Nice pics and good information. I'm sure that happens on some T/C barrels for whatever reason. I can also see where that would possibly create issues with lead conicals. Lead bullets deform very easy. Some people deform them loading them not knowing it and get horrible accuracy. If someone finds me a QLA miss lined that shoots Moa with sabots I'll show them I will shoot bore size bullets accurately. Your not going to deform thors, powerbelts, Lehighs, or the Parker bore size bullets I have for example. |
Originally Posted by super_hunt54
(Post 4233482)
That aint the finished work I would hope?
|
My impression is that we were talking about lead conical bullets, not: "thors, powerbelts, Lehighs, or the Parker bore size bullets I have for example." Your understanding may have been different.
|
I thought we were talking about all conicals?
|
Well I guess that's how misunderstandings happen. I more or less assumed lead conicals. Maybe its because they are what I shoot, maybe because they are the ones I and other shooters I know have had problems with in TC rifles with a misaligned qla.
|
I always think of lead conicals used more in sidelocks, and more modern bullets in inlines. We all think about it different though.
I would think a gun should shoot all conicals within reason. Meaning a proper length conical for the twist of the barrel. |
We all think about it different though. I always thought of conical bullets as pointed or rounded full bore bullets such as buffalo bullets or maxi bullets made of lead. Sabots being a different class and smaller diameter than the bore which are not allowed in places like Colorado. I view the power belt as another form of conical and believe they are legal in Colorado. |
Interesting point Muley. I know that one of TC's pat answers for why their rifles didn't shoot the conicals well was because their inlines had too fast a twist. This goes against what I have learned about shooting them. For example, I have had good accuracy shooting 50 caliber lead conicals in twists from 1 in 24, 1 in 28, and one in 32 inch twists. These bullets have a length that is anywhere from .900 up to 1.005
|
I think of the powerbelt as kind of unique because of the plastic skirt, the copper wash coat, and the fact that the bullet itself doesn't engrave the rifling when loading. Yes, it is legal in Colorado and I have heard they shoot acceptably in some of the TC rifles that won't shoot regular lead conicals well. I think this is due to the plastic skirt.
|
I look at that plastic skirt as functionally nothing more than a patch used as a wad with the exception of being semi attached to the bullet. They do fly well out of my 50 cal TC, load easily but at least IMO don't perform on game as well as a saboted Barnes which load really hard out of my 50 cal. My problem using them for hunting is the difficulty of reloading in the field if needed. If I foul a barrel then load for the hunt that 3rd load if necessary is hard.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.