How would you know about the CVA cases without Randy posting them?

As far as I know it's done on EVERY civil liability gun incident case.

Where's the results that the barrel was at fault in the CVA cases?

Show me that, and i'll put the blame on CVA, and buy a Knight.

When CVA settled they took the blame. It's that simple!!!

Said by someone who gets free Knight stuff.

You wouldn't be happy with a Knight. You need a Triumph or Encore.

True, which is why I own a CVA.

You've got all wrong, Pete. You're making unsubstantiated claims for situations you know nothing about and using that as your validation. That is, you weren't there with the shooters, you don't know what evidence was brought forward in court and those specialists that proved the barrels were suspect. Don't try to feed me that I wasn't there either nonsense. No, I wasn't, but I was able to provide information to substantiate the claims against BPI. Don't say it only involved magnum charges when that isn't correct, either. Take whatever stance you want. You opinion factually amounts to NUTHIN!

What I get for free has nothing to do with the law. People don't just settle all the time to be nice. You really should quit posting on this thread cause you have nothing to offer.

My cousin's brother's sister's son told me that his friends brother's cousin on his mothers side loaded it hot is NOT a valid argument in court