You provided nothing. We all read those reports long before you showed up.

I'm not going to debate this any longer. I had my say, and will continue to feel that way until i've seen proof otherwise. I've seen none so far.

So, not running away, but there's nothing more to say. I won't continue to repeat the same thing to those who don't understand who needs to show proof.

Anymore posts to me on this will be ignored unless you've come up with some proof besides what's been shown so far. Meanwhile i'll continue to enjoy my CVA.

Later.

I have to respond to this, because it's a different topic.


Yes, it has a lot to do with it Tom. It shows bias on your part.

While you're at it, I hope that means you'll quit following various board members around only to bring up RW, CVA or PB's in other threads. You might get banned for it, then you'd be all alone with RW.

On the point about lawsuits. They are settled all the time without a party admitting fault. Juries have a tendency to side with the injured party. Why do you think we don't have as many ladder manufacturers in the US anymore? Often times it is more economical to settle than to go through with a lengthy expensive trial.

A wise man told me a long time ago that when you're in business the less you say about your competition the better. Your product should be able to stand on its own merits.

On another issue, the brand bashing and shilling that go on in this forum are shameful. Might be one of the reasons activity here has slowed to a crawl.

Yep buyer beware......some older model CVAs might be suspect and they are still out there - and there is some data that supports that.
Nuf said.

JW