About those CVA muzzleloaders
#102
i thought it was the wolf rant about illegally how to kill them that got him canned with pedersoli?
I hunted with the WHC crew last year, great guys and the sponsorship they do, is actually for cva's website design and video work. They buy their own rifles and bullets believe it or not. Its always best to know what you are talking about before stating such things.
I hunted with the WHC crew last year, great guys and the sponsorship they do, is actually for cva's website design and video work. They buy their own rifles and bullets believe it or not. Its always best to know what you are talking about before stating such things.
#103
No Ram I have never worded for the auto industry. I worked for the USN where QC is much more stringent and lot sizes are smaller. I would think the auto industry relies on stastics to determine the amount of samples that need to be taken and adjust this quantity based on the results of the sampling inspection. And there are quite a few recalls on autos also. Heck my vehicle has had 3 recalls in the 4 or 5 years since I've owned it.
#104
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,926
Likes: 0
From: Saxonburg Pa
I notice you have brought back MD and his very first post was already looking to argue with people. Since you've let this go on I hope your not going to ban anyone for arguing back if they choose to?? Most will choose not to but just curious.
#105
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
Argue? Im long over that LOL. I'll leave the forum arguing and spamming up to you.
I left the forum on my own and after a nice break of relaxing and letting others use the forum without my "hostility" I figured it was time to come back and say hello to everyone Ive missed.
I just hope I dont get picked on for shooting round balls vs those pricy bullets ive read so much about!
I left the forum on my own and after a nice break of relaxing and letting others use the forum without my "hostility" I figured it was time to come back and say hello to everyone Ive missed.
I just hope I dont get picked on for shooting round balls vs those pricy bullets ive read so much about!
#106
Hwy MD you won't see me bashing you about shooting PRBs. My last 2 muzzies are RB shooters. Both GM barrels one a .50 and the other a .58. The .58 is a blast to shoot and I am seriously thinking of taking it bear hunting with me in PA this year. If it rains I will use my .45-70 Marlin 1895 Cowboy. Either way it will be a bit of nostalgia.
#107
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
You should! Its an awesome experience going after bear with a big ol nasty 58! A little rain shouldn't scare you off. Wrap the nipple threads in teflon tape to keep water from slowly seeping in, a good patch lube and just casually drape your arm over the lock if you are tree stand hunting.
#108
This is very interesting to me. I'm not sure your definition of brand bashing but I've seen it so far with two other companies. Are you just concerned with CVA bashing or all companies?? Me personally don't think reporting problems with any company is brand bashing.
I notice you have brought back MD and his very first post was already looking to argue with people. Since you've let this go on I hope your not going to ban anyone for arguing back if they choose to?? Most will choose not to but just curious.
I notice you have brought back MD and his very first post was already looking to argue with people. Since you've let this go on I hope your not going to ban anyone for arguing back if they choose to?? Most will choose not to but just curious.
I don't blind side anybody. But when the hammer falls you are told why.
1. I did not invite MD back he came on his own.
2. As long as it stays civil - let it continue but the brain cell comments is very close to causing some time off. The hash mark score card of mine is filling up fast.
3. I own more than just CVA's -
4. Agree with you about your comment about with reporting problems on products on any company no matter who it is and is why the thread was reopened after the copyright approval was granted. I didn't wait for word from GS - I went and asked myself directly to the author of that article and I did wait for HNI Admin approval here either. Once I had copyright approval this thread was reopened pronto even tho I knew there would be jabs thrown!
Now with all of you knowing that I will go form my posse. Keep it civil is all I ask. Quite a bit could and would be better suited using the Private Messaging system as it is between single users. If that is the case I highly recommend you do that.
JW
#109
This is very interesting to me. I'm not sure your definition of brand bashing but I've seen it so far with two other companies. Are you just concerned with CVA bashing or all companies?? Me personally don't think reporting problems with any company is brand bashing.
I notice you have brought back MD and his very first post was already looking to argue with people. Since you've let this go on I hope your not going to ban anyone for arguing back if they choose to?? Most will choose not to but just curious.
I notice you have brought back MD and his very first post was already looking to argue with people. Since you've let this go on I hope your not going to ban anyone for arguing back if they choose to?? Most will choose not to but just curious.
MD, just like all other members, will have to abide by the rules (see link below). All of you can discuss, disagree, have a difference of opinion and sometimes just end up agreeing to disagree but you can't insult other members, brand bash or commit any other rules violations. If you (or anybody else) violates the rules, your violation will be edited and you will be warned, temp banned or possibly permabanned, depending on the severity of the offense, track record, etc.
As you can see in rule # 17 (see below quote and link), forum rules and guidelines are not up for debate. That means nobody is allowed to challenge, complain about, question, etc. the rules in the forums. Each of you has a PM (Private Message) feature that you can use to send a mod a PM with any concerns you have about a rules, post, etc. If in doubt, use the PM. If you have questions, use the PM. That way the specific mod can answer your question/concern without either of you violating the rules.
Since you're "unsure" about JW's definition of what constitutes "brand bashing," I've included the link and HuntingNet rule about it in the quote below. That would be the definition that JW, I, all other mods and even Admin work from in regards to brand bashing. As you can see, it is not restricted to just the CVA company.
16. Brand Bashing and generally argumentative posts will not be tolerated. Legitimate posts regarding problems that you have experienced with a particular piece of equipment or service will be allowed. However, posts that are directly bashing a product or manufacturer are not allowed on HuntingNet.com. These forums and chat room are designed as a place for hunters to gather to exchange stories, advice, and meet other hunters from around the world – not to argue amongst ourselves or to talk down about any individual business or product. All posts of this nature will be removed and disciplinary action will be taken against their author.
17. Forum rules and guidelines are not up for debate. This is not a democracy, but rather a private forum. Anyone openly debating the rules we have set in place will be removed. Moderators of this forum are not to be argued with when enforcing forum rules and guidelines. Anyone arguing with a Moderator against disciplinary measures will be removed from the forum. If you have a problem with a Moderator please email [email protected] and we will address the issue as soon as possible.
http://www.huntingnet.com/articles/m...oom-rules.html
17. Forum rules and guidelines are not up for debate. This is not a democracy, but rather a private forum. Anyone openly debating the rules we have set in place will be removed. Moderators of this forum are not to be argued with when enforcing forum rules and guidelines. Anyone arguing with a Moderator against disciplinary measures will be removed from the forum. If you have a problem with a Moderator please email [email protected] and we will address the issue as soon as possible.
http://www.huntingnet.com/articles/m...oom-rules.html
Last edited by CalHunter; 08-04-2015 at 03:44 PM.
#110
JW...Read that post again about two brain cells. It wasn't pointed at any member.
Just a comment that if you believe Randy you can't be too smart. Nobody has admitted to believing Randy. I was careful how I worded it.
Just a comment that if you believe Randy you can't be too smart. Nobody has admitted to believing Randy. I was careful how I worded it.



