Originally Posted by
Grouse45
This is very interesting to me. I'm not sure your definition of brand bashing but I've seen it so far with two other companies. Are you just concerned with CVA bashing or all companies?? Me personally don't think reporting problems with any company is brand bashing.
I notice you have brought back MD and his very first post was already looking to argue with people. Since you've let this go on I hope your not going to ban anyone for arguing back if they choose to?? Most will choose not to but just curious.
Well let's clear the air a bit here Grouse since you asked!
I don't blind side anybody. But when the hammer falls you are told why.
1. I did not invite MD back he came on his own.
2. As long as it stays civil - let it continue but the brain cell comments is very close to causing some time off. The hash mark score card of mine is filling up fast.
3. I own more than just CVA's -
4. Agree with you about your comment about with reporting problems on products on any company no matter who it is and is why the thread was reopened after the copyright approval was granted. I didn't wait for word from GS - I went and asked myself directly to the author of that article and I did wait for HNI Admin approval here either. Once I had copyright approval this thread was reopened pronto even tho I knew there would be jabs thrown!
Now with all of you knowing that I will go form my posse. Keep it civil is all I ask. Quite a bit could and would be better suited using the Private Messaging system as it is between single users. If that is the case I highly recommend you do that.
JW