Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

traditional vs. modern

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:17 AM
  #11  
bronko22000's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 5
From: Eastern PA
Default

I definately have a preference for the traditional sidelocks. I just like the way they feel (and make me feel). I have one inline that I like to play with from time to time and occasionally take it out hunting. But the traditionals almost always get the nod for a hunt or to the range. The problem then becomes which traditional should I take. A nice predicament to be in I guess.
bronko22000 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:40 AM
  #12  
Muley Hunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

I played with inlines, and they have their place. Just not my place anymore.

I've sold all my guns except my GPR, and my Winchester 94 30-30 that my dad gave me in 1953. It's a wall hanger now.

I love the way the GPR looks, feels, and shoots. Very accurate, and easy to hold steady offhand. I went hunting for rabbits with it this morning, and saw a really nice buck. I got within 40yds of it, and it would have been in the freezer if it was ML season. It felt so right sneaking up on it with a Hawken style gun. I can't wait for next year.

I'll have to be content with rabbits, squirrels, and coyotes until the next big game season. By then, I should be able to shoot a gnat in the butt at 75yds with a PRB.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Likes: 0
Default

I started in the 70s with a custom made flintlock, made my own in the 80s...

Bought a Knight Disc in '98, used it a few times and put it up...

Glad I kept it because looks like since my cateract surgery open sights
may not work for me anymore...
nchawkeye is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 11:56 AM
  #14  
Muley Hunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Did they screw up the surgery? You should see better now.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 12:26 PM
  #15  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
Did they screw up the surgery? You should see better now.
No, the surgery went well and I can now for the first time in 50 years see without glasses...I was almost blind, only being able to see the big E when I got 5-6 feet from it...I also had a torn retna 10 years ago, that's why I had the cateract come up when I was 55...

But...I also have astigmatism so I couldn't go with a multifocal lens...This means that I need reading glasses and open sights are fuzzy as heck...I'm playing with different sights and will probably install a wider front sight...I'm just not comfortable shooting at game with open sights right now...With a scope, I'm still good...

Maybe next year I'll find a good combination but our eastern season is on now and the Piedmont season opens up in a week and a half...
nchawkeye is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 12:30 PM
  #16  
Muley Hunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Same problem with me. I'm going to try a peep, and a white bead front sight. Hope it works.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 01:40 PM
  #17  
bronko22000's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 5
From: Eastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
I'll have to be content with rabbits, squirrels, and coyotes until the next big game season. By then, I should be able to shoot a gnat in the butt at 75yds with a PRB.
MH, you better wait until he turns broadside. Otherwise he may just turn around a charge you. Those gnats are nasty critters and that PRB may not anchor him!!!!!!!!!!
bronko22000 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 01:59 PM
  #18  
Gm54-120's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,612
Likes: 0
Default

Modern smokeless inlines. I can load them to 45LC rifle specs or well past most 45/70 data and i clean them if and when i wish. Powder per shot is also much cheaper depending on your powder of choice.
Gm54-120 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 07:24 PM
  #19  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Gm54-120
Modern smokeless inlines. I can load them to 45LC rifle specs or well past most 45/70 data and i clean them if and when i wish. Powder per shot is also much cheaper depending on your powder of choice.
I must admit, I have a strong desire to build a smokless 700ML. But with a baby on the way, I can't spend that money in good conscience.
TNHagies is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-2011 | 07:34 PM
  #20  
Semisane's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,918
Likes: 1
From: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Default

Different strokes for different folks. I don't have even the tiniest desire for a smokeless ML.
Semisane is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.