![]() |
Size or Speed?
Which performs better? Watch this video, and you'll see speed is the answer.
http://www.archive.org/details/Termi...armsInOrdnance |
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 3801838)
Which performs better? Watch this video, and you'll see speed is the answer.
http://www.archive.org/details/Termi...armsInOrdnance |
Makes you wonder if in BP guns we shouldn't be going to small bullets and large powder charges.
|
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 3801845)
Makes you wonder if in BP guns we shouldn't be going to small bullets and large powder charges.
![]() That 200 traveling @ 2200-2300 fps makes quite an impression when it gets where it is going... Problem is if you go to light you loose energy very quickly. So they become less effective at longer ranges. Stacking powder doesn't work that well either as the bullet is out the barrel before all the powder can be burnt. Now if you had powder like smokeless that you could choose different rates of burn you might really be able to do something... |
You don't think that BH 209 is all burning in heavy loads?
Even inefficient BP will still increase FPS when big loads are used. Even if half of it blows out the barrel. |
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 3801853)
You don't think that BH 209 is all burning in heavy loads?
Even inefficient BP will still increase FPS when big loads are used. Even if half of it blows out the barrel. With T7 going from 110 to 120 grains I get a decent increase in velocity... going from 120-130 it is a very small jump, not even much worth the effort, so after 130 you are sending the rest out the barrel into the snow.... even at a 130 you shooting a % of that into the snow as unburnt powder... |
Only a few of the smokeless options give a excellent burn percentage. Those typically spike psi faster and use much less powder. Slower powders need more powder to make enough psi but end up running out of barrel without some load work. Using smokeless some people use a duplex charge to over come this. A small booster load (10gr) of faster powder first then the slower powder on top of that.
Kinda makes me wonder what 10gr of T7 under 100gr+ of BH209 would do with a 200gr bullet in a 45cal ML. Im curious but im not sure i want to try that one. |
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 3801838)
................... speed is the answer......................
Here is a video of a 440g conical at 1450fps The 200g bullet passed through 4 jugs, and was found on the ground. The 440g bullet passed through 5 jugs, and embedded into the phone books with a about 2" penetration. |
I believe Ron has showed speed is not always the answer.
|
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 3801845)
Makes you wonder if in BP guns we shouldn't be going to small bullets and large powder charges.
135grns of BH209 and 200grn bullet equals 2491 avg. 140grns of BH209 and 200grn bullet equals 2523 avg Knight Rifles is the only ML company that allows 150grn loads by volume. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.