Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

45 cal vs 50

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-25-2009, 03:59 PM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Default 45 cal vs 50

I lurked for years and have learned that you folks are crazy about muzzle loaders. what I dont understand is why so many of you have 45 cal rifles when it has been proven time after time that the 50 cal is the best for hunting`and more of everything is available for 50 cals. I have owned a traditions pioneer . which i still have because it is so much fun to shoot with patch and ball, I have also bought and sold 2 knight rifles and an omega because they did not shoot groups across sand bags that i felt i needed to hunt with. With each of these rifles including the disc elite that I now own i bought every bullet and powder and primmer or caps made and tested each.I go back to when powerbelts were called black belts and they came in plastic bags. I found Celil Epps because my son married a Canadian girl. I have litteraly spent Thousands on bullets, powder and primers.I dont have the time or the money to just shoot because i love to shoot. Are most of the regulars on this forum retired or independently wealthy or what?Please dont be offended by this post ,i dont mean any harm. I write like I talk and my wife says I am about as diplomatic as a tarantula in heat. I think, with the limited time and money i am maybe more crazy about hunting.
dead on is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 04:09 PM
  #2  
Dominant Buck
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

Are most of the regulars on this forum retired or independently wealthy or what?Please dont be offended by this post ,i dont mean any harm.
Retired? For many years now.
Independently wealthy? I could only wish.

I have time to shoot, and I watch sales and purchase in bulk. Plus a lot of my bulk shooting is with patch and ball or conicals,that I cast myself. BUT I honestly would hate to guess what I have in rifles and shooting supplies. If I ever sat down and figured it out.. I would have myself committed.


cayugad is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 04:18 PM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
sabotloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,703
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

dead on

45 vs 50.... I have just begun the search for the answer to this. For years I have always asked... why would you by a 45? there are so many different options available for a 50 and most anything you can shoot in a 45 I can shoot in a 50 and probaly just as well.

Theoretically there will be a velocity gain with a 45 over the larger bore 50, but how important is it? I am finding it is real no big deal - now that is just my opinion... but, after all of that is said I will keep my 45 as I believe I can shoot it cheaper than I can a 50. It becomes my 22-250 of ML's....

I have litteraly spent Thousands on bullets, powder and primers.I dont have the time or the money to just shoot because i love to shoot. Are most of the regulars on this forum retired or independently wealthy or what?
Ditto here, but I have been really forunate in the ML's that I have I have been able to make them shoot 'lights out.' And I hate to say this - I am one of those guys that everyday is 'Saturday' - I did retire in 2002 - but living on a fixed income is no picnic either - but shooting is my recreation and I do spend more than I should on the sport. I do not qualify for the independently wealthy portion of the quote I really wish I did...

I write like I talk and my wife says I am about as diplomatic as a tarantula in heat. I think, with the limited time and money i am maybe more crazy about hunting.
I am one of the most politically incorrect people in the world... Terry tells me so all the time... same as my coaching assignments... 'do it my way or the highway' - now I do not ever recall saying that but Terry says I really imply it... I do tell the kids - there is a 'wrong way' a 'right way' and a 'Peterson way' - they should probably consider the Peterson way the right way when playing for me and then when they get to the next way his way will be the 'right way.' I do not consider that being 'one way' but Terry does...

OK better quit before I dig to deep...
sabotloader is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 04:34 PM
  #4  
Boone & Crockett
 
Semisane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Posts: 10,917
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

Yep! I'm retired also. Wealthy? Not by a looonnng shot. My little Ford Ranger pick-up is six years old. The one I had before that was 11 when I sold it to a broker shipping used pick-ups to Mexico. I'm thinking about getting one of those new fangled Televisions that have color and something called a "remote". (Hey, that was a joke. ) When you hit your 60's, and the kids are grown and on their own, and the houseyou've lived in for 40 years is paid for, and your fortunateenough to not have big medical bills, you just kind of figure you ought to spend a little money on what you like - and I like to shoot.

EDIT: Oops. Almost missed the main topic completely. I have one .45 that I bought to play with. It's interesting and fun, but definitely not as versatile as a .50. Still, I'll be making a few hunts with it next season.
Semisane is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 04:35 PM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

I'm not sure if you are talking of inlines or sidelocks and roundballs...

In inlines, I prefer a .50 because of bulk sabots and bulk 44-45 caliber pistol bullets which can be easily mated together and used for hunting...

When it comes to sidelocks, flintlocks in my case, I prefer a .40 and a .54...The .40 is my small game gun and I go down to 25grs of FFF powder for a charge...A pound of powder will last a long time using that small of a charge...The .54 is my big game rifle...

I don't worry about components because I mold my own balls, buy patching in bulk and make my own lube and cleaner...So I'm spending most of the money on powder and flints...I can get 50-100 shots out of a flint if I take care of it...

As far as money, let's see...I'm self employed, have worked over 30 years and have 3 daughters...
I have bought them 3 cars, paid for 2 college degrees and one Masters and have paid for 2 weddings...

My payback so far??? None were pregnant before marriage, never had to go to jail to bail them out,
have always had very honest and frank conversations with them about boys and sex...I do have a 7 month year old grandson, that's priceless...
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 04:54 PM
  #6  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 364
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

One of those white male construction workers at the top of my field that our pres is down on. Make a decent living, don't drink, don't smoke, don't have a wife to spend what I do have. Mow my own grass, reload my ammo. Kids are grown and on their own. Eat a bunch of venison and noodle dishes, live in a mobile home and my house payments aren't as much as some. I shoot 2 days a week unless it's hunting season. Now I'm cutting down on my CF because of the current primer situation (namely there ain't none to be had). As to the 45 verses 50, my savage with a 45 pac-nor is awesome. My knights and other savage are 50's. And yep I'm in the market for a 45 so in taking it for a back up I only have to add BH or 777to the shooting box
rjhans53 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 05:39 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
gregrn43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: arkansas
Posts: 3,163
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

Retired? Nope work 4 nights a weektwelve and half hour shifts at two different ER's in two small towns here in Arkansas. Wealthy? I could only wish for. 45 vs 50 cals? All my ml are 50 cal





gregrn43 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 05:49 PM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

One thing i have noticed is everybody does things a different way. I used to be the one that said just buy a 50cal. The reason was you did not really have any good bullets. Now with the 200grn Lehigh in a 45 things have changed. Dont kid yourself, speed kills. I can almost reach 2600fps with a 200grn Lehigh and have a bullet that works. That's close to 30-06 speeds. With the 50 i can really only do about 2300 to 2350. Of course i'm just talking black powder subs. But here again the 50cal can use a wide variety of bullets and 45's are illegal to hunt Elk in Idaho to mention one state. So if your only gonna own one, you better buy a 50cal.
Grouse45 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 06:17 PM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kerrville, Tx. USA
Posts: 2,722
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

what I dont understand is why so many of you have 45 cal rifles when it has been proven time after time that the 50 cal is the best for hunting`.

what I dont understand is why so many of you have Chevys when it has been proven time after time thatFord is the best for hunting`.

Everyone hastheir own opinion andbelly button too!

P.S. I own 3 50 calibers and no 45's because I hunt Colorado!
txhunter58 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 07:06 PM
  #10  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,747
Default RE: 45 cal vs 50

I've hunted with both the .45 and the .50 cal ML in the traditional versions (hawkens) and every deer I've shot with either didn't know the difference. With experience with both - I would have to say that for deer or hogs, choose whatever trips your trigger.
bronko22000 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.