Laminate or composite
#2
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Depends upon the quality of each. There are very good laminates and very good synthetics, but also the other end ofthe quality scaleis well represented. A good synthetic has to be the most durable stock one can buy, is usually lighter in weight than a good laminate, and often have something to grip in wet weather when the laminate will just get slicker. Laminates can certainly be more attractive and some withstand recoil better than some of the synthetics. Just MHO.
#3
I agree.
I still like wood better in the hands andon the bench(recoil). I findwood easier to bed and tweak(work with). Was a period wheresynthetic stocked rifles where my thing butI have beenmoving back to wood or laminates.
IMHO eye candy award will always go to wood andutility awardgoes to synthetic. Both have merits so it boils down to feel and function on a personal level.
I still like wood better in the hands andon the bench(recoil). I findwood easier to bed and tweak(work with). Was a period wheresynthetic stocked rifles where my thing butI have beenmoving back to wood or laminates.
IMHO eye candy award will always go to wood andutility awardgoes to synthetic. Both have merits so it boils down to feel and function on a personal level.
#4
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,585
Likes: 0
Because of the way they are now making the plastic stocks just barely strong enough I would go with a laminated. If the start making a laminated for the Triumph I will get one especally if its a thumbhole stock if not I willlikely have to set down and go to work making one next summer. Lee
#5
If both of them are a quality stock.. the composite is more weather proof probably and lighter. I have laminate stocks. They do make the rifle more heavy. But I have them well waxed and never had a problem in the rain and snow with them. Also they are a solid feeling rifle, absorb recoil real well, and are beautiful to look at. If I had the choice, and they were both high end stocks, I would probably take the composite stock though. But if all I could find was the laminate.. I would not overlook it for that reason.
#6
ORIGINAL: lemoyne
Because of the way they are now making the plastic stocks just barely strong enough I would go with a laminated. If the start making a laminated for the Triumph I will get one especally if its a thumbhole stock if not I willlikely have to set down and go to work making one next summer. Lee
Because of the way they are now making the plastic stocks just barely strong enough I would go with a laminated. If the start making a laminated for the Triumph I will get one especally if its a thumbhole stock if not I willlikely have to set down and go to work making one next summer. Lee
#8
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Wood is richer -- better resale value
It's quieter when branches knock against it.
It balances better
Shotsrecoils better - more straight back at you.
The only drawback I have with laminates areoccasional somewhat-slippery forends.
It's quieter when branches knock against it.
It balances better
Shotsrecoils better - more straight back at you.
The only drawback I have with laminates areoccasional somewhat-slippery forends.
#9
It depends on who's stock it is. On my Omega I filled the butt up with foam insulation and installed a Sims recoil pad it is as quiet as anything else I own. Those Sims recoil pads work!! If it is damp the wood stocks are slick and they seem to me to be colder to the touch That's just my opinion. If I were buying another ML it would be a Synthetic no question.




