Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

New Muzzleloader

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-27-2007 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default New Muzzleloader

Hi, my name is Dom and I'm buying my first muzzloader. I decided on the following rifles(without the thumbhole design): T/C Omega sst w/ Comp. stock, Omega sst w/ straight laminated stock and the Triumph with the weathershield finish.

I can get the Omega sst/laminated stock for $489(black comp. for $399) and the Triumph for $425(black comp./weathershield). All three guns are well within my price range so it really boils down todeciding between the three.I welcome any comment or suggestions. In other words, help me decide.

Thanks
Dominick is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 03:28 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,180
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

ss/laminated. The syn. stocks are weak. Weather shields costs damn near as much as a ss version.
frontier gander is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 03:35 PM
  #3  
cayugad's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,193
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

I've been reading so many posts about how nice these new Triumphs are, there must be something to them. The trouble is while the reports of the Triumph are great, we know that the Omega is a time tested rifle. That is a hard decision. I like both rifles but do not own either. If I were buying one, I would go with the Triumph simply because they have corrected some of the faults of the old Omega, and it has some new features that are very nice. Still with any of them you are not going to go wrong...

Good luck making a choice..
cayugad is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 04:04 PM
  #4  
sabotloader's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,703
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

Dominick

I have botha SS Omega and a blued Omega... I have both the grey/black laminate stock and the black synthetic. I prefer the black synthetic over the laminate stock.

The laminate stock is slick when wet, it adds undo weight to the gun, the stock is bulky thick for my hands - but it is certainly stronger than the black synthetic, but,, the black synthetic is an easily fixed problem.

I do prefer the Omega over the Triumph only for one reason - I am not fond of a break open design... It is my personal belief that the break opens are harder to keep zeroed and do not shoot as tight as a one piece gun, over the long period of time... just me.

Check this string out...

http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=2472957


sabotloader is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 04:35 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

WOW, 1 vote for each. Thanks, but it really is a tough choice. If the triumph came with a stainless barrel and had a longer track record the decision might be easier but ease of cleaning is a big plus. I assume the 2nd shot loading without swabbingis difficult with all T/C's using triple-7?
Dominick is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 04:42 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Northwest IL
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

I would get the SS Laminate Omega. I have a Omega with a Synth. Stock. I am disappointed in it. I just ordered a Laminated stock. I do really like the Omega. My Father in Law has the triumph but not enough time to pass judgment.
Scott
versdog is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 04:47 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

ORIGINAL: Dominick

Hi, my name is Dom and I'm buying my first muzzloader. I decided on the following rifles(without the thumbhole design): T/C Omega sst w/ Comp. stock, Omega sst w/ straight laminated stock and the Triumph with the weathershield finish.

I can get the Omega sst/laminated stock for $489(black comp. for $399) and the Triumph for $425(black comp./weathershield). All three guns are well within my price range so it really boils down todeciding between the three.I welcome any comment or suggestions. In other words, help me decide.

Thanks
I have an Omega, blue with the Comp stock. Very accuracte gun. This review says the Triumph replaces the Omega, so get the Triumph:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/thompson-center_triumph.htm

Chap Gleason
gleason.chapman is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Tri Cities, Washington
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

I'd take the Triumph for one reason...........to disagree with Sabotloader!
cascadedad is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,585
Likes: 0
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

I have both, all that a Triumph is an Omega thats elmininated blowback and is super easy to clean; other than that the break open action and the differances you will find between any two rifles because of harmonics is all there is. But I would not trade my Triumph for two Omegas. Lee
lemoyne is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-2007 | 05:05 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default RE: New Muzzleloader

BTW, does the Triumph and Omega use the same scope mount? I plan on using Warne medium rings and one piece Maxima base.
Dominick is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.