Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
#9
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
From: Mormonville, Utah!
If you look at how TERRIBLE the editors did their job you would have to knock it down to a 6-7. Then plug into the equation the fact of how much was not really covered in The Return of the King and you would be forced to knock it down to a 5!
#10
5??? I'd like to see you do a better job![8D] They couldn't cover a whole lot because those books are so long. If they did cover it all, you'd still give it a 5 because you'd be sore from sitting in the theater for 6 hours!



]