War in iraq?
#31
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
most of u out there who don't believe in the war then ur most likely democrats, which means baby killers, and gun haterssobugger off,sorry,but if u say u don't belive in the war, i know u did after 911 so quit being hippacrits.bush gave iraq and afganistan rights they went from liveing in fear everyday wondering if they were going to die,living under dictators.now they can vote and women too.they have a democacy and are free.and bush is fighting terror, not iraq.he caught sadaum, so y are u crying?everyone in congress vored to go to iraq even john edwards and john kerry(gun haters and baby killers)so if u don't like it then go to canada, or write your congress man or something,cause everyone wanted to and so did congress, to bad, we helped out afganistan and iraq and were defeating terrorism.half of you don't have any idea what u are saying,we only lost under 2000,i know that seems like a lot but in gettsburg alone the us lost like a million soldiers and thats no lie.if they sign up for the military they know what there getting in too.god bless the troops and screw off democrats...ahahaha
#33
ORIGINAL: kbick
ahahah i didn't notice that they edited stuff on here dang that sucks
thay took all the good stuff out
ahahah i didn't notice that they edited stuff on here dang that sucks
thay took all the good stuff out
#34
brutal, lol.... i love ya.... but leave me alone on this one lol. you know me.. i just like to stir the pot. these aren't set in stone; they're designed to make one think and not just view the issue from one side. in order to find the right answer one must first discover the wrong answer then study the problem from all sides. and not every answer is right and not every answer is wrong. some are both.
ok. democrat? no. i don't choose sides such as liberal, democrat or republican. they're all wrong.
abortion: i believe the choice is a woman's own. not some yuppie manwho has no idea what the feeling is like.
gun hater? of course not. i own several. its not guns that kill, its people.
its hippocrates. thanks. and after 9/11, i did not believe in an all out war.I believed in attacking the group causing the trouble; Not the country that is already broken. They still live in fear every day. If their government worked for them, then so be it. We shouldn't be sticking our noses where it doesn't belong. Afghanistan and Iraq are very different. We went to Afghanistan to get revenge. Revenge that has failed to be carried out. We went to Iraq to be a jerk. They aren't free. And whats better? A dictator or an army controlling the country?
Hm. If he is fighting "terror" then why is it that FOX news and CNN blasts THE WAR IN IRAQ across the bottom screen? And again, its Saddam. At least have some respect. The reason they wanted to go to Iraq was because there were "WMDs" (yeah right). We didn't help Afghanistan or Iraq. They're still blowing eachother up an we can't control it. We left them in shambles and now nobody knows what to do.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. I also know that Bush and his rightist friends are in trouble. And only 2000? Glad you think they're so expendable. I'm sure their parents and wives and husbands and children would love to hear that. Sure they sign up, and yeah they know the risks. The problem is, they signed up because they believed they would make a difference, not cause an international uproar. As for the screw off democrats? How about screw off republicans. Lets throw the liberals in there too. How about everybody. People should start learning to think for themselves instead of herd along with the rest of the sheep.
most of u out there who don't believe in the war then ur most likely democrats, which means baby killers, and gun haterssobugger off
abortion: i believe the choice is a woman's own. not some yuppie manwho has no idea what the feeling is like.
gun hater? of course not. i own several. its not guns that kill, its people.
,sorry,but if u say u don't belive in the war, i know u did after 911 so quit being hippacrits.bush gave iraq and afganistan rights they went from liveing in fear everyday wondering if they were going to die,living under dictators.now they can vote and women too.they have a democacy and are free.
and bush is fighting terror, not iraq.he caught sadaum, so y are u crying?everyone in congress vored to go to iraq even john edwards and john kerry(gun haters and baby killers)so if u don't like it then go to canada, or write your congress man or something,cause everyone wanted to and so did congress, to bad, we helped out afganistan and iraq and were defeating terrorism.
Hm. If he is fighting "terror" then why is it that FOX news and CNN blasts THE WAR IN IRAQ across the bottom screen? And again, its Saddam. At least have some respect. The reason they wanted to go to Iraq was because there were "WMDs" (yeah right). We didn't help Afghanistan or Iraq. They're still blowing eachother up an we can't control it. We left them in shambles and now nobody knows what to do.
half of you don't have any idea what u are saying,we only lost under 2000,i know that seems like a lot but in gettsburg alone the us lost like a million soldiers and thats no lie.if they sign up for the military they know what there getting in too.god bless the troops and screw off democrats...ahahaha
#35
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
im sorry u don't believe this way,but ur wrong in some ,well all of ur points.first off if you vote your either a republican, democrat or independent(they never win so it doesn't matter).and if you don't vote don't say anything bad about anyone in office.so ur one or the other.another thing republicans are conservatives and democrats are liberals.u got mixed up.afganistan and iraq are better and continue to get better, they have presidents,and elections,there are still terrorists but bush has made they numbers dindle.i feel forrible for the families of those lost soldiers and there NOT expandable.but what i meant was those are low numbers for a war compared to everyother war.and no i have no absolutely no respect for sadam what so ever!niether should you.he torchered his country, and ruled with an iron fist.he killed thousand upon thousand of people.if u respect him then go to canada or go live in the cell with him.yes the war is in iraq but thats a location it never and never says war on iraq,were against terror not iraq.screw of democrats(baby killers and gun haters)and if u don't believe me look at the numbers in congress of how republicans and democrats vote.democrats are hippies and liberal fags,they have gun haters, gays, and baby killers on there side.republicans have chruch goers(for the most part),sportsman,and conservatives.
#36
democrats are hippies and liberal fags,they have gun haters, gays, and baby killers on there side.republicans have chruch goers(for the most part),sportsman,and conservatives.
if you're going to feel so strongly about something, you should at least get your facts straight and learn to speak intelligently.
#37
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
my facts are right i think you should go stick to talking to peoplethat are ur age,although u probally wouldn't be able to find one thats ur age and not mature.sorry,please try to prove me wrong with hard facts. cause i know u can't.ahahaha,democrats suck
#38
See, you're not getting the facts straight. I never told you that your facts were wrong, I just told you they weren't in order. You have no point in your argument which doesn't present for a valid argument.
#39
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
hey hunting girl, havent argued with you in a while, and i honestly don't know how this thread came back, or a new one was started, but as to your going along with the sheep herder and being sheep, that is exactly what makes Bush so unique, he doesnt do what other people tell him, he does what he thinks is right. You can choose not to think so, and as you can see by his current ratings, the majority of united states citizens are taking your viewpoint.
I look at the situation like in the movie hotel Rwanda, i know its just a movie, but look at the situation these people are in. What would you do if you were the leader of a country? Nato tells everyone to not go help these people, even though they need it. If you go help them, the helpers will suffer casualties, and end up killing a lot of native citizens, some who by chance may be innocent. but if you don't go help, all those people will die or be maken slaves, but the aggressors will live better. It is a very similar situation to Iraq except for the motivation of going there. It is to centralize an area where the terrorists would react outside of our nation, and at the same time help people in dire need of liberation. Democracy through history has proven to be the most stable and prosperous government possible, and will give these people what they want in a ruler. I know right now it seems like we are determing what is better for them and not letting them have a say, but it is not just an issue of American safety, its an issue of human rights, and global security. A stabalized middle East will slowly but surely stabalize the rest of the world, seeing as how it is the most unstable area on earth at this point, and the biggest threat to the world.
I look at the situation like in the movie hotel Rwanda, i know its just a movie, but look at the situation these people are in. What would you do if you were the leader of a country? Nato tells everyone to not go help these people, even though they need it. If you go help them, the helpers will suffer casualties, and end up killing a lot of native citizens, some who by chance may be innocent. but if you don't go help, all those people will die or be maken slaves, but the aggressors will live better. It is a very similar situation to Iraq except for the motivation of going there. It is to centralize an area where the terrorists would react outside of our nation, and at the same time help people in dire need of liberation. Democracy through history has proven to be the most stable and prosperous government possible, and will give these people what they want in a ruler. I know right now it seems like we are determing what is better for them and not letting them have a say, but it is not just an issue of American safety, its an issue of human rights, and global security. A stabalized middle East will slowly but surely stabalize the rest of the world, seeing as how it is the most unstable area on earth at this point, and the biggest threat to the world.
#40
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
also, i know im not a women and will never have kids, but that doesnt matter..if you truley believe that it is murder to have an abortion, no matter what sex you are, you will be against abortion, and try to convince people otherwise. Which is why the other presidential candidates stand on the issue makes no sense. If you truley believe your murdering someone, yet say you have no intention of telling people how to deal with the matter is wrong. Not trying to start beef. But I don't know if it is such a sex issue as it is a religious/moral belief. Regardless of how it feels to be pregnant unexpectantly, i think it deals more with morals than that. Although I do understand where it would be a difficult decision, but if someone were to point a gun to my head and say, (kinda like the movie saw) " you have a choice, kill this person, or you die. If you die, the other person lives. If you kill the other person, you live. I would let the man shoot me in a heartbeat. Or if i was to be paralized for the rest of my life if i wouldn't kill a person, id take being paralized. Its kinda the same with abortion. (if you believe at conception there is human life) Sure having the baby may hurt like hell and ruin maybe the rest of your life, but if you value life of others, youd have the baby and sacrafice yourself. Thats just me. I know its hard to talk about it untill youve been put in that situation, and it probably is one of the hardest decisions a couple may have to make in their entire lives, but you gotta do what is morally right to you, and make sure you don't make a decision that will effect your consiounce later in liife.


