[Deleted]
#11
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
1sagittarius; I have to agree with SAK on this one. The Sawtooth oak is a lower (50-60 ' ) tree which populates the nitch between shrubs and the climax forest. White oks grows taller (90' ). They should form the climax forest and replace the Sawtooth Oaks as the forest matured.
You' re correct that planting foreign species of plants has changed our environment. Common grass and dandelions are just 2 examples of introduced species. Unfortunately; we have lost so many of our original food trees that something needs to be planted to fill the nitch. American Chestnuts were a major food source lost this century. Chinese Chestnuts could fill some of the need as they' re generally resistant to blight. We live in a world so changed from the original. Logging cleared the best trees which just happened to be oaks, walnuts, hickories, cherry and chestnut. Just the trees that wildlife needed the most. The trees that grew back tended to be early successional trees like birch and poplar. The forests which we think of as old today are not comparable to those that we lost.
Wildlife has adapted by eating farm crops to make up the shortage. Deer (at least in my area) have expanded to areas that they never existed in before land clearing. Imported wildlife (Pheasants, hares etc.) were introduced. Imported fish (Rainbow trout, salmon, brown trout, carp) were released and are now some of our most prized trophies.
We' re planting clovers, alfalfa, trefoil. In fact, most of the crops we' re recommending on this forum are imports. It' s wise to know the effect of planting/introducing/changing anything in our " natural" environment but the positives of providing food sources have to be weighed against future problems. Some species (eg. Norway Maple) I won' t plant, but so many others are only filling holes left by the loss of our natives.
Dan O.
I found this quote in an article about the effect of the Chestnut blight on the Eastern US forest canopy:
" Plant pathogens can equally overwhelm an entire ecosystem. The chestnut blight fungus arrived in New York City in the late 19th century on nursery stock from Asia and in less than fifty years had spread over 225 million acres of the eastern U.S., destroying virtually every chestnut tree. Because chestnut had comprised a quarter or more of the canopy of tall trees in many forests, the effects on the entire ecosystem were staggering, although not all were obvious. For example, several insect species that live only on the chestnut are now extinct or endangered. A less predictable result is an increase in the oak wilt disease in many native oak species, since the trees that replaced many of the chestnuts were red oaks, which are particularly susceptible to the blight."
Dan O.
You' re correct that planting foreign species of plants has changed our environment. Common grass and dandelions are just 2 examples of introduced species. Unfortunately; we have lost so many of our original food trees that something needs to be planted to fill the nitch. American Chestnuts were a major food source lost this century. Chinese Chestnuts could fill some of the need as they' re generally resistant to blight. We live in a world so changed from the original. Logging cleared the best trees which just happened to be oaks, walnuts, hickories, cherry and chestnut. Just the trees that wildlife needed the most. The trees that grew back tended to be early successional trees like birch and poplar. The forests which we think of as old today are not comparable to those that we lost.
Wildlife has adapted by eating farm crops to make up the shortage. Deer (at least in my area) have expanded to areas that they never existed in before land clearing. Imported wildlife (Pheasants, hares etc.) were introduced. Imported fish (Rainbow trout, salmon, brown trout, carp) were released and are now some of our most prized trophies.
We' re planting clovers, alfalfa, trefoil. In fact, most of the crops we' re recommending on this forum are imports. It' s wise to know the effect of planting/introducing/changing anything in our " natural" environment but the positives of providing food sources have to be weighed against future problems. Some species (eg. Norway Maple) I won' t plant, but so many others are only filling holes left by the loss of our natives.
Dan O.
I found this quote in an article about the effect of the Chestnut blight on the Eastern US forest canopy:
" Plant pathogens can equally overwhelm an entire ecosystem. The chestnut blight fungus arrived in New York City in the late 19th century on nursery stock from Asia and in less than fifty years had spread over 225 million acres of the eastern U.S., destroying virtually every chestnut tree. Because chestnut had comprised a quarter or more of the canopy of tall trees in many forests, the effects on the entire ecosystem were staggering, although not all were obvious. For example, several insect species that live only on the chestnut are now extinct or endangered. A less predictable result is an increase in the oak wilt disease in many native oak species, since the trees that replaced many of the chestnuts were red oaks, which are particularly susceptible to the blight."
Dan O.
#12
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Further info from US government sources:
Sawtooth oaks planted on reasonably productive sites using the guidelines described here will produce prolific crops of acorns in 7 to 10 years. Acorn production is fairly consistent year to year. However, minimal crops can be expected following late spring or early fall frosts. Yields from mature trees in good years range from 1,000 to 1,300 pounds of acorns per tree.
Sawtooth Oak, native to Japan, China, and Korea, is a species introduced because of its rapid establishment and heavy fruit production at an early age, serving as a source of food in late summer and throughout autumn for wildlife. Large birds (crows, bluejays, turkeys), squirrels, deer, racoons, opossums, and other mammals love the large, abundant crops of acorns, which are borne heavily every other year, if not every year. This Oak is easy to identify by its pyramidal shape in youth, striated young bark, retained winter foliage, acorns with frilled caps, and finely serrated leaves (from which it gets its common name). It is planted throughout most of Ohio, and may reach 60 feet tall by 60 feet wide at maturity, when found in the open. As a member of the Red Oak group and the Beech Family, it is related to the Beeches, Chestnuts, and other Oaks.
Dan O.
Sawtooth oaks planted on reasonably productive sites using the guidelines described here will produce prolific crops of acorns in 7 to 10 years. Acorn production is fairly consistent year to year. However, minimal crops can be expected following late spring or early fall frosts. Yields from mature trees in good years range from 1,000 to 1,300 pounds of acorns per tree.
Sawtooth Oak, native to Japan, China, and Korea, is a species introduced because of its rapid establishment and heavy fruit production at an early age, serving as a source of food in late summer and throughout autumn for wildlife. Large birds (crows, bluejays, turkeys), squirrels, deer, racoons, opossums, and other mammals love the large, abundant crops of acorns, which are borne heavily every other year, if not every year. This Oak is easy to identify by its pyramidal shape in youth, striated young bark, retained winter foliage, acorns with frilled caps, and finely serrated leaves (from which it gets its common name). It is planted throughout most of Ohio, and may reach 60 feet tall by 60 feet wide at maturity, when found in the open. As a member of the Red Oak group and the Beech Family, it is related to the Beeches, Chestnuts, and other Oaks.
Dan O.
#13
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Sewickley PA USA
Dan O, Thanks for the support. You present some great facts.
1sagittarius, If you ASSUME that the saw tooth will be as detrimental to the environment as some of the less desirable exotics such as multiflora rose and the zebra mussel than you are correct. The problem is that you are asumming. Can you site any studies that support that the saw tooth will be an detrimental exotic? On the other hand what if it fills a niche that is currently missing in many of our forests as sited by Dan O? Once again I am only in this to talk to others about something I love and to learn from others, not cheap and classless shots.
1sagittarius, If you ASSUME that the saw tooth will be as detrimental to the environment as some of the less desirable exotics such as multiflora rose and the zebra mussel than you are correct. The problem is that you are asumming. Can you site any studies that support that the saw tooth will be an detrimental exotic? On the other hand what if it fills a niche that is currently missing in many of our forests as sited by Dan O? Once again I am only in this to talk to others about something I love and to learn from others, not cheap and classless shots.
#14
SAK, while DanO' s info is interesting, it says nothing to indicate that the sawtooths would not dominate over native oaks.
You ASSUME the sawtooth is will not be detrimental to the environment, yet like it, because it produces more seed than native oaks??
At tree speed, a 200 year test observation may not be enough time to determine competition effects between sawtooths and native oaks. Yet what we know now is that sawtooths produce the most nuts/seeds..... that should be enough for a logical conclusion.
You ASSUME the sawtooth is will not be detrimental to the environment, yet like it, because it produces more seed than native oaks??
At tree speed, a 200 year test observation may not be enough time to determine competition effects between sawtooths and native oaks. Yet what we know now is that sawtooths produce the most nuts/seeds..... that should be enough for a logical conclusion.
#15
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,079
Likes: 0
From: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
The Sawtooth Oak was first introduced to the U.S. in 1862 and has proven to be a very beneficial tree for wildlife. I have read numerous articles about them and have yet to see a negative article for any reason. A lot of them written by professors at many of the universities that specilize in forestry. It doesn' t compete well with other timber types so the taking over of our forest isn' t a concern. I' ve seen a number of them growing and havn' t witnessed advancing reproduction.
#16
Ok, so what if there are no native oaks in the area? It sounds as though this would be a way to introduce a mast crop in less than 10 years. That would be a big plus for wildlife, wouldn' t it!
. . . Rob
. . . Rob
#20
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
I' ve seen zone 5-9 and 6-9 listed for Sawtooths while Northern Red Oaks are 4-8. They appear to be a little less cold resistant than White Oaks. I' d love to get some acorns but when I tried last year from a source in NY it was going to cost $50+ dollars for 2 lb of acorns.
Dan O.
Dan O.


