worst mag. article i ever read!!!
03-26-2005, 06:35 AM
#42
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 1,157
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
ORIGINAL: Maineguide5424
You were doing good until I come to the part about shooting a deer when you were 6
.......I quit reading there.[8D]
You were doing good until I come to the part about shooting a deer when you were 6
.......I quit reading there.[8D]
03-26-2005, 06:41 AM
#43
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 162
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
that's like saying " what not to do" that woulda made more sense. that disguest's me to why would they put something so bad in a hunting mag ? must have been a anti hunter that published the issue
03-26-2005, 11:52 AM
#45
Typical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 866
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
ORIGINAL: killer243
that is good for you but if you are like most of us who have tried shooting through brush you will see a tiny stick could deflect you bullet enough to miss or make a bad hit. this making the shot unethical to ME. once i shot a at a coyote standing behind a tiny bush i took the shot and the bullet struck a stick about 1/2 the size of a pencil and the bullet deflected and his him in the guts instead of the shoulder i was aiming at. so yes small brush WILL send a bullet off it's path. some times maybe only a little bit but i am not going to chance it
let's all jump on Jim Zumbo.I forget, know of you have ever been caught up in the moment and took a shot that you probably shouldnt have taken. Is shooting at a deer through brush illegal? And how is it unethical? If given a shot through a light screen of brush, i'd take it with a rifle or shotgun anyday of the week.
03-26-2005, 02:13 PM
#46
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 1,157
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
ORIGINAL: Maineguide5424
Show me one 6 year old kid that can put a deer rifle up to his shoulder and shoot it. I wouldn't even let someone bring a little kid like that on a hunt.
Show me one 6 year old kid that can put a deer rifle up to his shoulder and shoot it. I wouldn't even let someone bring a little kid like that on a hunt.
your shortsighted , myopic statement just took all your credibility away with me.
03-26-2005, 06:38 PM
#47
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
I quit reading
03-26-2005, 06:41 PM
#48
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
I wouldn't even let someone bring a little kid like that on a hunt.
03-26-2005, 08:28 PM
#49
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,846
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
ORIGINAL: Jack Ryan
People who shoot "through brush" need to have that bullet deflected, right up their own arse.
ORIGINAL: killer243
that is good for you but if you are like most of us who have tried shooting through brush you will see a tiny stick could deflect you bullet enough to miss or make a bad hit. this making the shot unethical to ME. once i shot a at a coyote standing behind a tiny bush i took the shot and the bullet struck a stick about 1/2 the size of a pencil and the bullet deflected and his him in the guts instead of the shoulder i was aiming at. so yes small brush WILL send a bullet off it's path. some times maybe only a little bit but i am not going to chance it
let's all jump on Jim Zumbo.I forget, know of you have ever been caught up in the moment and took a shot that you probably shouldnt have taken. Is shooting at a deer through brush illegal? And how is it unethical? If given a shot through a light screen of brush, i'd take it with a rifle or shotgun anyday of the week.
slayer
03-27-2005, 06:01 AM
#50
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 50
RE: worst mag. article i ever read!!!
20 yards!! You measured his horns, counted the points and couldn't shoot him.
I've had clients like that, we offer them their money back if they'd like to go home and do something they're more qualified for.
I've had clients like that, we offer them their money back if they'd like to go home and do something they're more qualified for.