|
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
One price, lifetime license the size of a credit card. Got it in your pocket, you are good to go. Anything in season with any legal weapon.
[/quote] this dont seem all stupid to ta me,but what would a guy pay for such a liscence??[:@] |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper Don't have it and it isn't necessary.One incident like the Vang case is not enough reason to implement such a system.Sort of like saying registering all guns is a good idea because it helped solve one crime. |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
One price, lifetime license the size of a credit card. Got it in your pocket, you are good to go. Anything in season with any legal weapon. this dont seem all stupid to ta me,but what would a guy pay for such a liscence?? |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
the back tag number is extremely useful in identifying tresspassers and finding poachers. i myself have called a tresspasser in using his back tag number and its silly to believe that the Vang case is a isolated incident in which a backtag was useful. i would gladly wear a back tag in the future.
do those people against this have license plates on their vehicle? |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
Here in vt we dont have them either. To me, not having to dont see any need for them. Thats not saying if were to go out of state to hunt, wouldnt base the"where t go" on a bk tag.
|
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
ORIGINAL: BOWFANATIC What year was that Jack? I dont remember ever being issued a white tag in 30 years of deerhunting in Wisconsin. I'm not familiar with trap shooting clubs but if they are serving alchohol before and during shooting , they should be shut down , it's illegal , intoxicated use of a firearm. I agreed to shoot in a leage but soon as the season was done so was I. They did it at every shoot I attended. People would show up and drink until it was their turn to shoot. Then even a few would stay and drink until they got to shoot after the leage was done. It was in Milton north of Janesville. Nobody acted like it was any big deal and when I brought it up a few of them claimed to shoot better drunk. What could I say? They did. The whole safety situation there was out of hand if you ask me. Over half of the shooters I saw there would have been tossed out of every trap club I've shot at in Indiana if they pulled all the stuff I saw there. Most clubs I've shot at, the other shooter's wouldn't hesitate to jump your a.. over a closed chamber any where but ready to shoot at your bird. Not up there. |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
One more thing for the anti-hunters to use to make hunters jump through one more hoop. |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
ORIGINAL: onebullet this dont seem all stupid to ta me,but what would a guy pay for such a liscence??[:@] It was worth the money just to know we can any time we want to. http://www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/licenses/lifelic.htm PRICES Basic Fishing – $285.00 Equivalent to annual resident fishing license. Does not include trout / salmon stamp. Basic Hunting – $285.00 Equivalent to annual resident hunting license. Does not include stamps, deer or turkey licenses. Comprehensive Fishing – $427.50 Includes the basic fishing license plus trout/ salmon stamp. Comprehensive Hunting – $855.00 Includes all required hunting licenses and stamps. Does not include trapping license or federal migratory bird hunting stamp. Hunting and Fishing – $1154.25 Includes all licenses and stamps covered by Comprehensive Fishing and Comprehensive Hunting licenses. Trapping – $280.00 Equivalent to current annual resident trapping license. |
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
When I see a picture of somebody wearing a blaze orange jacket/coveralls and they have a "tag number" on their back, to me they look more like an escaped prisoner then a hunter.
|
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
Well here in Wisconsin we have ALOT of public hunting land! Not to many of them there ranches where people pay alot of money to hunt each year. We have alot of different people in the woods and these are the "Big Woods" where someone might think they can get away with something. If you see someone not wearing one they could be up to something, Sorry but I go by the book! What the WIDNR needs to do is tie this backtag in with the law enforcement to keeping the wrong people from getting a Hunting AND Fishing license. Hunting and Fishing is a privilege not a right! JMO
When I see a picture of somebody wearing a blaze orange jacket/coveralls and they have a "tag number" on their back, to me they look more like an escaped prisoner then a hunter. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.