Ridge runner
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 115
Ridge runner
I have some Sciroccos bonded 3006 150 gr.
@200 yards vel. is 2492 and 2069 ft. lbs.
Interlocks are 2386 in vel. and 1888 ft lbs.
So should I use the Sciroccos for what I want to do ?
@200 yards vel. is 2492 and 2069 ft. lbs.
Interlocks are 2386 in vel. and 1888 ft lbs.
So should I use the Sciroccos for what I want to do ?
#2
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 115
Hatchie luvr
In your opinion can the sciroccos bonded be a compromise to the heavy weights ?
Vel. @200 yards is 2492 and 2069 in ft lbs
Interlocks @200 is 2386 vel. and 1888 in ft lbs
For 3006 150 gr.
I want to sight in today
Vel. @200 yards is 2492 and 2069 in ft lbs
Interlocks @200 is 2386 vel. and 1888 in ft lbs
For 3006 150 gr.
I want to sight in today
Last edited by White Oak 06; 11-02-2014 at 06:27 AM.
#4
I think you're making this more difficult than it needs to be. A lot of bullets will deliver very fast kills, and a lot of bullets will stick together while punching through bone. I personally would rather deliver a fast kill with a lighter built bullet to the vitals than worry about crippling deer by breaking their shoulders. Conversely, I'd honestly expect SLOWER kill from a harder bullet, they don't open as much and don't transfer as much energy/momentum to the game. To knock deer off of their feet "DRT," you need to dump a lot of energy very quickly - hard bullets won't do that. Deer just aren't that tough, so they don't offer enough resistance to expand harder pills and scrub off momentum - it just puts a deeper hole in the ground on the back side.
100fps and 200ft.lbs. difference will not matter in the least. Either will kill deer fast when placed right, as will a more frangible bullet like a Winchester 150grn BST. You've been posting a lot about this lately, and honestly, I feel like you're chasing your tail. You simply need to find an accurate load, not worry so much about maximizing your weight retention.
100fps and 200ft.lbs. difference will not matter in the least. Either will kill deer fast when placed right, as will a more frangible bullet like a Winchester 150grn BST. You've been posting a lot about this lately, and honestly, I feel like you're chasing your tail. You simply need to find an accurate load, not worry so much about maximizing your weight retention.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,648
I think you're making this more difficult than it needs to be. A lot of bullets will deliver very fast kills, and a lot of bullets will stick together while punching through bone. I personally would rather deliver a fast kill with a lighter built bullet to the vitals than worry about crippling deer by breaking their shoulders. Conversely, I'd honestly expect SLOWER kill from a harder bullet, they don't open as much and don't transfer as much energy/momentum to the game. To knock deer off of their feet "DRT," you need to dump a lot of energy very quickly - hard bullets won't do that. Deer just aren't that tough, so they don't offer enough resistance to expand harder pills and scrub off momentum - it just puts a deeper hole in the ground on the back side.
100fps and 200ft.lbs. difference will not matter in the least. Either will kill deer fast when placed right, as will a more frangible bullet like a Winchester 150grn BST. You've been posting a lot about this lately, and honestly, I feel like you're chasing your tail. You simply need to find an accurate load, not worry so much about maximizing your weight retention.
100fps and 200ft.lbs. difference will not matter in the least. Either will kill deer fast when placed right, as will a more frangible bullet like a Winchester 150grn BST. You've been posting a lot about this lately, and honestly, I feel like you're chasing your tail. You simply need to find an accurate load, not worry so much about maximizing your weight retention.
RR