Blood Trail Problems
#11
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 269
The more Murby posts on this site in the couple months he's been on here the bigger headache he's becoming. I really am beginning to wonder if he really is a hunter or just a plant or troll on this site with all the crappola he keeps coming up with. Talk about , LOL!
Why don't you just lay flat on the ground and start banging your hands and feet.. maybe that will get you some attention...
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 1,071
whats wrong with giving a little friendly advise on possibly trespassing? OP looks like a decent hit but could be in a non vital area..as others said if its a heart/lung/liver shot its not going to go a mile. If the blood stopped it either clotted in which case its not a mortal wound (in the sense its going to die quickly). Or a possibility someone else found your deer and picked it up...or its dead somewhere near the last blood.
#13
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
Wilcam47---I think in the two months that Murby has been on this site that he has already appointed himself as Super Moderator, LOL! If you haven't noticed already, he has made many similar posts on other threads and has also made some statements that would make one wonder whether he's a hunter or a PETA member plant. A good one was his latest comment to Flags that trapping with foothold traps should be outlawed. I was going to respond to that, but decided that with all his goofy rejoinders to my recent posts that all he would do would be to come back with some more BS and his little smilie critters!!!
#14
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 269
Wilcam47---I think in the two months that Murby has been on this site that he has already appointed himself as Super Moderator, LOL! If you haven't noticed already, he has made many similar posts on other threads and has also made some statements that would make one wonder whether he's a hunter or a PETA member plant. A good one was his latest comment to Flags that trapping with foothold traps should be outlawed. I was going to respond to that, but decided that with all his goofy rejoinders to my recent posts that all he would do would be to come back with some more BS and his little smilie critters!!!
And you call me goofy?
There you go little one.. I gave you some attention... Lets watch you run with it.
#15
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,230
Well jee whiz.. I did read it.. again.. and I still don't find anywhere in his post where he was looking for any advice on laws or property rights.. For all you know, he could be surrounded by state land.. who cares.. he didn't ask for that kind of advice.
Since it would seem that you believe he needs legal advice because he's traveling off his property in search of a blood trail, why not give him clothing advice too? Maybe driving advice? Weather updates? Heck, you can even throw in some astrology while you're at it.
(ya, I'm being sarcastic but you get the point)..
I understand the property thing is a big "hot button" for you.. but he's looking for help following a blood trail.. lets stick to that..
Since it would seem that you believe he needs legal advice because he's traveling off his property in search of a blood trail, why not give him clothing advice too? Maybe driving advice? Weather updates? Heck, you can even throw in some astrology while you're at it.
(ya, I'm being sarcastic but you get the point)..
I understand the property thing is a big "hot button" for you.. but he's looking for help following a blood trail.. lets stick to that..
Now, you may be correct and he could very well be surrounded by miles and miles of public land. Then again, he may not. You can't tell by his post can you? So when he asks for advice about recovering the deer (which the entire post is about) it seems logical to make sure the given advice doesn't get him into any possible legal trouble. Verifying he has permission is something that will prevent such issues. You may be comfortable working on the assumption that he can just go on with the blood trail without considering such things, I however am not, which is why I mentioned it. In my experience, assumption without verification is the mother of most major screw-ups and can easily be avoided.
Now, you are welcome to disagree with any advice I give the man but I will point out that you have yet to show where the advice lacks validity. In other words, you are being obtuse simply for the sake of being obtuse due to the fact that we have differing view points about property boundaries. Or is there another underlying issue I'm not aware of? Remember, advice is merely a suggestion. Nobody can force anybody else to take action on it. It isn't "telling" someone to do something, rather it is an offer of possible solutions and it is up to the person doing the asking, and not you, to decide which course of action to pursue. You don't seem to be able to grasp that concept.
Last edited by flags; 12-20-2013 at 10:33 PM.
#20
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 269
Copy/Paste the question to 10 other forums not related to huntingnet.com and see how many members will respond with legal advice about property boundaries.
If fact, while it would probably seem odd to do so, you could copy and paste that question into a legal forum filled with lawyers and I bet you STILL WOULD NOT get property boundary advice...
In other words, you are being obtuse simply for the sake of being obtuse due to the fact that we have differing view points about property boundaries.
You were being obstinate with the totally unwarranted advice.. I was just pointing that out.
Think of it this way.. If a member asked "My buddies and I are driving up to our cabin for the season and we need advice on a good cabin heater"
And people started responding "Please make sure you don't drink any alcohol while you're driving up there!"...
It doesn't make a lot of sense does it? The advice is perfectly valid, it is also totally off topic.
And yes, the only reason I called you out on that was because of our previous debate.
With sincere respect, I hope you understand my position. I've made my point and made you aware.. I won't call you out on it again.