New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
#11
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
They are not required but do make some aspects easier. and depending on the type of treestand you are wanting they can be even more affordable than most realize. A simple hang on stand like Rivers Edge can be picked up for as little as 60 bucks some times. But like they said hunting from the ground can be just as prductive as long as precautions are taken to watch the wind and scent control and movement.
#12
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
You didn't say if you are bow or gun hunting. If bow hunting it's alot better to use a tree stand but it's not nesicary. If hunting with a gun its not as important. I usually hunt from a stand when bow hunting and more often than not i will hunt from the ground with a gun.
#13
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
I'll be hunting with a Mossberg ATR-100 .270 win....by the way, what is good to reduce the recoil? I really don't like the kick! (my husband says that it's "just a little kick", ha ha! yeah right...not for me!)
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,607
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
As most have already said, its not a must but in some instances it is very nice. I like to gun hunt (I only usea ML) from the ground. But bow hunting is a lot easier from a tree. Climbing stands are the way to go but are more expensive to buy. The advantage is that you can just climb any tree you want and don't have to prepare by hauling everything in ahead of time. Plus if the wind is wrong you just climb down and climb up another tree. Everyone has their preferences but those are my $0.02
#15
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
This is only my third season hunting, and you definitely don't need the treestand. I got one when I first started out. I used it and still use it, but an injury keeps me from sitting in it too long. I wound up hunting from the ground using blinds made from brush and available cover as well as spot and stalk. I took my first one last year from the ground and I have seen more deer hunting from the ground than I have from the stand. I hunted every day this week from the ground and saw animals every day but today. This may have to do with my being able to hunt longer on the ground than in the stand. I also gave up on watching those hunting shows, if you notice they always seem to be hunting on game ranches. I don't have a game ranch. Good luck!
#16
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
to reduce the recoil i would look into a limb saver recoil pad! they arent all that expensive! my brother has one for his 12 ga. remington, that kicks like a mule when he runs slugs through it! it is all rubber and slides on the butt of the gun! well you have to pull it over the butt of the stock!
#18
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,828
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
You don't really need a tree stand. I now have two set up and there are some advantages. I hunted 15 years without them. But instead of just setting on the ground I either used a 5 gallon bucket with a lid, good to carry a few extra thing with you. Later I made me a "tree seat" tha attaches the the tree with a ractchet strap. These keeps your rear end dry if the ground is wet.
#20
RE: New to hunting...Tree stands are really necessary?
ORIGINAL: LadySyl
I'll be hunting with a Mossberg ATR-100 .270 win....by the way, what is good to reduce the recoil? I really don't like the kick! (my husband says that it's "just a little kick", ha ha! yeah right...not for me!)
I'll be hunting with a Mossberg ATR-100 .270 win....by the way, what is good to reduce the recoil? I really don't like the kick! (my husband says that it's "just a little kick", ha ha! yeah right...not for me!)
The heavier the gun, the less recoil. I'm really little so I use a .50 caliber Hawken style muzzleloader. I can hardly feel it.