Community
Whitetail Deer Hunting Gain a better understanding of the World's most popular big game animal and the techniques that will help you become a better deer hunter.

Too Big??

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-02-2007 | 08:00 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Too Big??

Mine is a 35 whelen with 200 grain soft points, works really well
95% drop right there the other 5% I have to track about 30 yards
" Kidsthat grow up Huntin , fishin ,and trappin dont mug little old lady's"

harold40 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2007 | 09:14 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Too Big??

ORIGINAL: thegamehunter

Is a .300 WSM 180 grain too big for a whitetail, antelope & other CXP2 game?? Any thoughts??
Too big, no, but it is alot more than is "needed". I have a couple of 300 WSMs and use 150 gr ballistic tips in mine. I killed a doe a couple of weeks ago at 30 yards+/- and wasted almost the whole front end due to tissue damage. She never knew what hit her, but it was a mess. The only reason that I took the gun hunting was it was new, and I had never killed anything with it. It is definitely "bloodied" now.

Why 180 gr and not 150 gr for your 300 WSM?
retrieverman is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2007 | 04:19 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Too Big??

Retrieverman: Well I was thinking 180 grain so I wouldn't have to rezero my rifle. So I would only have to buy 1 type of ammo that I could use on deer to elk sized game. I'm just not sure if the 150 grain from a 300 WSM would be sufficient for Elk? But Winchester claims that their new XP3 ammo can do the job - thats what I'm trying to get opinions on.
thegamehunter is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2007 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Too Big??

ORIGINAL: thegamehunter

Retrieverman: Well I was thinking 180 grain so I wouldn't have to rezero my rifle. So I would only have to buy 1 type of ammo that I could use on deer to elk sized game. I'm just not sure if the 150 grain from a 300 WSM would be sufficient for Elk? But Winchester claims that their new XP3 ammo can do the job - thats what I'm trying to get opinions on.
I completely understand now. I do believe the 180 grs would be better suited for elk in most ammo, but what are going to be hunting the most? I just looked up the XP3 ammo, and there is not enough difference in the 150 gr and 180 gr to worry about it. I would shoot the 150 grs at everything. As a matter of fact, I will probably change to them myself.
retrieverman is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2007 | 04:58 PM
  #15  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Too Big??

Nosler makes the new accubond in 165gr which I would use instead of the 180gr or the 150gr .
They shoot great out of my rifle and they seemed to stay together fine on an elk that I shot thru both front shoulders.
motrin is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2007 | 05:24 PM
  #16  
JagMagMan's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,514
Likes: 0
From: Port Neches, Texas
Default RE: Too Big??

As long as you can handle it, bigger IS better, but not always needed!
JagMagMan is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-2007 | 05:56 AM
  #17  
DoctorDeath's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 1
From: Huntsville Alabama
Default RE: Too Big??

I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...

dd
DoctorDeath is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-2007 | 06:14 AM
  #18  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: powers MI. usa
Default RE: Too Big??

use what your comfortable with,My brother shoot's a 300,He never had to track a deer,
If you take the front shoulder shot don't plan on salvaging much meat off the shoulder.
9th tine is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-2007 | 11:14 AM
  #19  
ipscshooter's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,366
Likes: 5
From: The Republic of Texas
Default RE: Too Big??

ORIGINAL: DoctorDeath

I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...

dd
I would think that trying to make up for poor shooting by using a magnum is only going to make your poor shooting worse, and result in missed, or worse, wounded game. A deer with a 100 gr. .243 through the lungs is going to be a heckuva lot deader than a deer with the latest 180 gr. .300 Super Duper Mag. through the guts. I'd much rather see someone who is proficient with a light-recoiling .243 on my lease than someone who closeshis eyes and prays when he sets off a round from his magnum.
ipscshooter is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-2007 | 11:46 AM
  #20  
zrexpilot's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default RE: Too Big??

ORIGINAL: ipscshooter

ORIGINAL: DoctorDeath

I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...

dd
I would think that trying to make up for poor shooting by using a magnum is only going to make your poor shooting worse, and result in missed, or worse, wounded game. A deer with a 100 gr. .243 through the lungs is going to be a heckuva lot deader than a deer with the latest 180 gr. .300 Super Duper Mag. through the guts. I'd much rather see someone who is proficient with a light-recoiling .243 on my lease than someone who closeshis eyes and prays when he sets off a round from his magnum.
I agree 100%
I get sick of the room for error statements. There is no such thing as "room for error"
zrexpilot is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.