Too Big??
#12
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: thegamehunter
Is a .300 WSM 180 grain too big for a whitetail, antelope & other CXP2 game?? Any thoughts??
Is a .300 WSM 180 grain too big for a whitetail, antelope & other CXP2 game?? Any thoughts??
Why 180 gr and not 150 gr for your 300 WSM?
#13
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From:
Retrieverman: Well I was thinking 180 grain so I wouldn't have to rezero my rifle. So I would only have to buy 1 type of ammo that I could use on deer to elk sized game. I'm just not sure if the 150 grain from a 300 WSM would be sufficient for Elk? But Winchester claims that their new XP3 ammo can do the job - thats what I'm trying to get opinions on.
#14
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: thegamehunter
Retrieverman: Well I was thinking 180 grain so I wouldn't have to rezero my rifle. So I would only have to buy 1 type of ammo that I could use on deer to elk sized game. I'm just not sure if the 150 grain from a 300 WSM would be sufficient for Elk? But Winchester claims that their new XP3 ammo can do the job - thats what I'm trying to get opinions on.
Retrieverman: Well I was thinking 180 grain so I wouldn't have to rezero my rifle. So I would only have to buy 1 type of ammo that I could use on deer to elk sized game. I'm just not sure if the 150 grain from a 300 WSM would be sufficient for Elk? But Winchester claims that their new XP3 ammo can do the job - thats what I'm trying to get opinions on.
#15
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From:
Nosler makes the new accubond in 165gr which I would use instead of the 180gr or the 150gr .
They shoot great out of my rifle and they seemed to stay together fine on an elk that I shot thru both front shoulders.
They shoot great out of my rifle and they seemed to stay together fine on an elk that I shot thru both front shoulders.
#19
ORIGINAL: DoctorDeath
I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...
dd
I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...
dd
#20
ORIGINAL: ipscshooter
I would think that trying to make up for poor shooting by using a magnum is only going to make your poor shooting worse, and result in missed, or worse, wounded game. A deer with a 100 gr. .243 through the lungs is going to be a heckuva lot deader than a deer with the latest 180 gr. .300 Super Duper Mag. through the guts. I'd much rather see someone who is proficient with a light-recoiling .243 on my lease than someone who closeshis eyes and prays when he sets off a round from his magnum.
ORIGINAL: DoctorDeath
I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...
dd
I would think of your not real proficient shooting a rifle then the 300 mag would give you room for error ...
dd
I get sick of the room for error statements. There is no such thing as "room for error"


