Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > West
 Way to go Montana!!! >

Way to go Montana!!!

Community
West MT, CO, WY, NM, NV, UT, CA, ID, WA, OR, AZ, HI, AK

Way to go Montana!!!

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-14-2005, 12:04 PM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
summit daWg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington Wa. USA
Posts: 1,386
Default Way to go Montana!!!

Montana tells Feds to Butt Out
Montana gives it's opinion or the RAT tax. More sates should follow suit.
summit daWg is offline  
Old 06-17-2005, 09:18 AM
  #2  
Typical Buck
 
Montana Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Posts: 512
Default RE: Way to go Montana!!!

I think the Forest Service is getting the message


Forest Service tweaks fee program in Northern Region
Posted at 2 p.m. June 16
By SUSAN GALLAGHER Associated Press







HELENA - The Forest Service fee program that critics call "pay to play" is dropping charges at about 500 trailheads, picnic areas and other sites nationwide, but only three are in the agency's Northern Region.

People who go to Quake Lake near West Yellowstone no longer must pay to picnic or walk a trail, but a fee to enter the Quake Lake Visitor Center will continue. Fees at two cabins in the Northern Region are ending, as well, but several other cabins are joining the fee list.

Forest Service officials around the country recently studied whether sites with fees met new requirements that the sites have amenities such as permanent toilets, parking and security. The fee program began in 1996, became permanent last year and has been attacked widely as a constraint on the public's use of public places. Legislatures in Montana, Colorado and Oregon want Congress to repeal the fees.








aAds = new Array();
aAds[0] = new Array();
aAds[0][0] = 'breaker+middle';
aAds[0][1] = '22753';
aAds[0][2] = 'jpg';
aAds[0][3] = 'http://www.crestviewapts.com/crestview/';
aAds[0][4] = '1';
displayAd('http://adsys.townnews.com', 'missoulian.com', aAds);



At Quake Lake, where visitors learn about a 1959 earthquake and landslide that killed 28 people, the Gallatin National Forest had been charging $5 a carload for admission to the visitor center, use of a picnic area and use of a trail leading to a memorial boulder. People who did not wish to enter the center, but did want to picnic or walk the trail, still were expected to pay the $5.

"We felt the facilities involved with going to the memorial boulder or having a picnic didn't justify the fee," Terry Knupp of the Northern Region staff said Thursday. She also said collecting fees only for trail use or picnicking was inefficient.

The only other fees being dropped in the Northern Region - which covers 25 million acres in Montana, northern Idaho and slices of Washington, North Dakota and South Dakota - are for use of a cabin in the Idaho Panhandle National Forest and one in Montana's Custer National Forest.

Knupp said no one rented the Idaho cabin the past few years. The Custer cabin got little use and needs maintenance work. The Forest Service is adding three Montana cabins to its fee list.

Fee critics such as Colorado's Western Slope No-Fee Coalition say charges amount to double taxation because American taxpayers already support federal lands. While fees are understandable at amenity-laden national parks and interpretive centers akin to museums, some critics say, the Forest Service imposed fees at relatively primitive locations and put some recreation seekers at risk of being priced out.

But the agency said a national survey found 80 percent of people believe they get a good value for fees they pay at day-use sites. Amenities the money helps fund include boat ramps, groomed ski trails and parking areas cleared of snow, the Forest Service said.

Knupp said that of the Northern Region's 1,280 sites with structures of one kind or another, 67 percent remain open free of charge. Most of the fee sites are campgrounds, she said.

She also said the Northern Region has relatively few fee sites compared to other places. There are fewer developed sites in the region because the population is relatively small and therefore, the demand for sites is light, Knupp said.

Montana Bob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BareBack Jack
Big Game Hunting
8
11-15-2005 08:47 AM
muley69
Big Game Hunting
1
03-24-2005 06:34 PM
shootr mcgavvin
Big Game Hunting
15
07-28-2004 02:55 PM
trapper T
Big Game Hunting
6
05-02-2003 10:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Way to go Montana!!!


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.