Community
Waterfowl Hunting Receive the benefit of experienced duck and goose hunters in this waterfowl forum.

3 1/2 vs. 3"

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-28-2004, 04:10 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
jepcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,670
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

I just bought a Remington 11-87 with 3.5" chamber. I went with the 3.5" mainly because I am going to be hunting turkeys with it. But even if I dont always shoot 3.5's out of it...I always CAN if I need to.
jepcho is offline  
Old 02-29-2004, 08:19 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blue Mound Kansas USA
Posts: 2
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

TomyD
I did`nt make any kind of statement about killing birds at extreme ranges,or that the 3 1/2 kills bird`s 20 yrds farther than a 3". I have hunted long enough I don`t need any lecture on hunting ethics or killing ranges! I simlpy stated it WILL kill birds that are out of range of the standard 3",only makes sense. Even if you only gain the 5 yrd`s you state,that is still 5 extra yrds for a" KILLING SHOT" on a flareing bird! The simple fact is a 3 1/2 carries more shot & delivers it at greater speed,so it will provide more knock down power no matter the range! My standard way to load is 3" first then the 3 1/2 for EXTRA RANGE, it a option that you don`t have with a standard 3" chambered gun!!
Chinchy is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 11:22 PM
  #13  
Spike
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Meeker, Colorado
Posts: 83
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

Well me ein a newbie at this i bought my BPS in a 3.5 just from a stand point that i got it on sale at the same price of the 3". Just thought what the heck? If i ever wanna shot the big loads i can, ive found that the 3"ers seem to work fine within range and im poor so all i shoot is steel. i guess im tryin to say is............everyone to there own
MtnGuy75 is offline  
Old 03-05-2004, 06:56 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

I'm no ballistics expert but I think a 3" mag will shoot harder than a 3.5 for the simple reason that you have the same amount of powder pushing a smaller load of shot. But I will also say I shoot 3.5" guns and shells because it's a personal preference that bigger is better and I might need those extra BB's to hit what I'm shooting at.
WaterfowlXtreme is offline  
Old 03-08-2004, 11:54 AM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
JoeA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waipahu HI USA
Posts: 2,915
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

The simple fact is a 3 1/2 carries more shot & delivers it at greater speed,so it will provide more knock down power no matter the range!
Chincy,
Maybe they make 3.5" shells differently for waterfowl than turkeys, but 3" shells go faster & hit harder down range than 3.5" The 3.5" has more shot, but the increase in shot weight is not proportional to the increase in powder. That kind of stress on a gun will wear it out faster. Go to your local range, and pattern 3" & 3.5" shells on paper. You may be in for a surprise.
JoeA is offline  
Old 03-09-2004, 02:01 PM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redcliff,AB.,CAN
Posts: 500
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

ORIGINAL: JoeA

The simple fact is a 3 1/2 carries more shot & delivers it at greater speed,so it will provide more knock down power no matter the range!
Chincy,
Maybe they make 3.5" shells differently for waterfowl than turkeys, but 3" shells go faster & hit harder down range than 3.5" The 3.5" has more shot, but the increase in shot weight is not proportional to the increase in powder. That kind of stress on a gun will wear it out faster. Go to your local range, and pattern 3" & 3.5" shells on paper. You may be in for a surprise.
Looking at the ballistics chart, I'd say the speed/hitting power "advantage" of 3" is, at best, nominal. The 3 1/2", 1 3/8 load moving at 1550 looks like a hell of a goose load to me. http://www.kentgamebore.com/public/products/fasteel.asp
plainsman is offline  
Old 03-16-2004, 08:22 AM
  #17  
Giant Nontypical
 
Carpmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere in Michigan
Posts: 5,702
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

The extra payload in the 3.5" is worth it for turkey and waterfowl, not to extend range, but to provide a more dense patern for cleaner kills. Dead is dead anyway you look at it, last I checked. The 3.5" just makes more birds dead for me than wounded. Last year i shot 3.5" exclusively for ducks and geese and had my best season with kill percentage.
Carpmaster is offline  
Old 03-16-2004, 05:14 PM
  #18  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 34
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

well guys thanks for the info , i think im gonna get a 3.5 super x2 or a browning gold
ncwannabeduckhunter is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 04:40 PM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redcliff,AB.,CAN
Posts: 500
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

Both very good choices, best of luck!!
plainsman is offline  
Old 03-19-2004, 10:28 AM
  #20  
Giant Nontypical
 
Carpmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere in Michigan
Posts: 5,702
Default RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"

In response to the 1 3/8 oz loads moving at 1550 fps, kents fasteel loads and federals speed shok loads both work awesome for ducks and geese. I used both last fall and their performance was awesome compared to standard steel loads.
Carpmaster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.